Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31170953›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2019

Examining social determinants of health: the role of education, household arrangements and country groups by gender.

Jordi Gumà, Aïda Solé-Auró, Bruno Arpino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. "When I Retire, I'll Move Out of the City": Mental Well-being of the Elderly in Rural vs. Urban Settings.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jordi GumàDepartment of Political and Social Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Carrer Ramón Trias Fargas 25-27, 08005, Barcelona, Spain. jordi.guma@upf.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2640-5391
Aïda Solé-AuróDepartment of Political and Social Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Carrer Ramón Trias Fargas 25-27, 08005, Barcelona, Spain.
Bruno ArpinoResearch and Expertise Centre for Survey Methodology (RECSM), Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

Adrenal Androgen Blockade for Metastic Prostate CancerR43CA099875 · NCI · ORPHAGEN PHARMACEUTICALS · PI THACHER, SCOTT MCNEAR · 2003 to 2004
$500k
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (RTI2018-099875-J-I00)Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad "Juan de la Cierva" (FJCI-2015-25066)Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (PCIN-2016-005)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe majority of empirical studies focus on a single Social Determinant of Health (SDH) when analysing health inequalities. We go beyond this by exploring how the combination of education (micro level) and household arrangements (mezzo level) is associated with self-perceived health.

methodsOur data source is the 2014 cross-sectional data from the European Survey of Living Conditions (EU-SILC). We calculate the predicted probabilities of poor self-perceived health for the middle-aged European population (30-59 years) as a function of the combination of the two SDHs. This is done separately for five European country groups (dual-earner; liberal; general family support; familistic; and post-socialist transition) and gender.

resultsWe observe a double health gradient in all the country groups: first, there is a common health gradient by education (the higher the education, the lower the probability of poor health); second, household arrangements define a health gradient within each educational level according to whether or not the individual lives with a partner (living with a partner is associated with a lower probability of poor health). We observe some specificity in this general pattern. Familistic and post-socialist transition countries display large differences in the predicted probabilities according to education and household arrangements when compared with the other three country groups. Familistic and post-socialist transition countries also show the largest gender differences.

conclusionsHealth differences in European populations seem to be defined, first, by education and, second, by living or not living with a partner. Additionally, different social contexts (gender inequalities, educational profile, etc.) in European countries change the influences on health of both the SDHs for both women and men.

Indexed as

Educational StatusFamily CharacteristicsHealth Status DisparitiesSex FactorsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDiagnostic Self EvaluationEuropeFemaleHumansIncomeMaleMiddle AgedSocial ConditionsSocial Determinants of HealthEducationEuropeGender differencesHousehold arrangementsSocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID31170953
PMCPMC6555096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.