Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31170944›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2019

Effect of a participatory organizational workplace intervention on workplace social capital: post-hoc results from a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Elisabeth Framke, Ole Henning Sørensen, Jacob Pedersen, Thomas Clausen, Vilhelm Borg, Reiner Rugulies

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Social cohesion, social capital and mental health: current evidence and future research directions.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Social Capital and Self-Rated Health: Empirical Evidence from China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elisabeth FramkeNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkallé 105, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark. elf@nfa.dk.
Ole Henning SørensenNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkallé 105, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jacob PedersenNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkallé 105, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Thomas ClausenNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkallé 105, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Vilhelm BorgNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkallé 105, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Reiner RuguliesNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkallé 105, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

Danish Working Environment Research Fund 28-2010-03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA high level of workplace social capital (WSC) may contribute to the protection of employees' health. We hypothesized that a participatory workplace intervention would increase the level of WSC defined as vertical WSC (i.e. WSC linking together employees and their leaders) and horizontal WSC (i.e. WSC bonding employees together).

methodsWe conducted a secondary data analysis of a cluster randomized controlled trial that was implemented among all employees in 78 municipal Danish pre-schools (44 intervention and 34 control group schools). The study sample consisted of 606 employees, 386 in the intervention and 220 in the control group. The intervention aimed to improve the psychosocial working environment by using a participatory approach and focusing on core job tasks. Vertical and horizontal WSC was measured by five and four items, respectively, at baseline and at 24-months follow-up. We estimated intervention effect by calculating the interaction of change over time by group assignment (intervention versus control group) and included workplace identification number in a repeated statement to take into account that employees were nested within workplaces. We conducted post-hoc analyses to examine whether intervention effect differed by implementation degree.

resultsWSC decreased in both groups. In the main analyses, there was no statistically significant difference between intervention and control group, neither for vertical nor horizontal WSC. However, when we excluded intervention workplaces with a low degree of implementation, we found a statistically significant difference between the intervention and the control group (estimate: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.00 to 0.50, p = 0.049), indicating that vertical WSC decreased in the control group and remained stable in the intervention group.

conclusionsThere was not a statistically significant difference between intervention and control group in the main analysis. Post-hoc analyses, however, suggest that the intervention may have prevented a decrease in vertical WSC among employees in workplaces with a high or a medium degree of implementation. A conference abstract with the key results of this study has been previously presented and published, European Journal of Public Health, Volume 28, Issue suppl_4, November 2018, cky260, https://academic.oup.com/eurpub/article/28/suppl_4/cky260/5187184 .

trial registrationISRCTN16271504 , retrospectively registered on November 15, 2016.

Indexed as

Occupational HealthSocial CapitalAdultCluster AnalysisDenmarkFemaleHealth Plan ImplementationHealth PromotionHumansMaleMiddle AgedSchoolsWorkplaceHorizontalOccupational healthPsychosocialRCTVerticalWorkplace social capital

Identifiers

PMID31170944
PMCPMC6554896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.