Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31170941›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2019

Process evaluation of the healthy primary School of the Future: the key learning points.

N H M Bartelink, P van Assema, M W J Jansen, H H C M Savelberg, G F Moore, J Hawkins, S P J Kremers

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02800616 (The Healthy Elementary School of the Future), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02800616 nacompletednot on this map

The Healthy Elementary School of the Future

TypeinterventionalSponsorMaastricht UniversityRan2015 to 2020Enrolled2,349ConditionsOverweight, Physical Activity, Malnutrition, Child DevelopmentArmsThe Healthy Primary School of the Future, The Physical Activity School
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Exploring primary school years interactions around child weight: A qualitative meta-synthesis of school staff, parent, and child views and experiences.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

N H M BartelinkDepartment of Health Promotion, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands. n.bartelink@maastrichtuniversity.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8098-5289
P van AssemaDepartment of Health Promotion, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
M W J JansenPublic Health Services, Academic Collaborative Centre for Public Health Limburg, P.O. Box 33, 6400, AA, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
H H C M SavelbergDepartment of Nutrition and Movement Sciences, NUTRIM, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200, MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
G F MooreCentre for the Development and Evaluation of Complex Interventions for Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, 1-3 Museum Place, Cardiff, CF10 3BD, Wales.
J HawkinsCentre for the Development and Evaluation of Complex Interventions for Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, 1-3 Museum Place, Cardiff, CF10 3BD, Wales.
S P J KremersDepartment of Health Promotion, School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM), Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200, MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Funding

Friesland Campina Project Number LLMV00Limburg provincial authorities Project Number 200130003Medical Research Council MR/K023233/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile schools have potential to contribute to children's health and healthy behaviour, embedding health promotion within complex school systems is challenging. The 'Healthy Primary School of the Future' (HPSF) is an initiative that aims to integrate health and well-being into school systems. Central to HPSF are two top-down changes that are hypothesized as being positively disruptive to the Dutch school system: daily free healthy lunches and structured physical activity sessions. These changes are expected to create momentum for bottom-up processes leading to additional health-promoting changes. Using a programme theory, this paper explores the processes through which HPSF and the school context adapt to one another. The aim is to generate and share knowledge and experiences on how to implement changes in the complex school system to integrate school health promotion.

methodsThe current study involved a mixed methods process evaluation with a contextual action-oriented research approach. The processes of change were investigated in four Dutch primary schools during the development year (2014-2015) and the first two years of implementation (2015-2017) of HPSF. The schools (each with 15-26 teachers and 233-389 children) were in low socio-economic status areas. Measurements included interviews, questionnaires, observations, and analysis of minutes of meetings.

resultsTop-down advice, combined with bottom-up involvement and external practical support were key facilitators in embedding HPSF within the schools' contexts. Sufficient coordination and communication at the school level, team cohesion, and feedback loops enhanced implementation of the changes. Implementation of the healthy lunch appeared to be disruptive and create momentum for additional health-promoting changes.

conclusionsInitiating highly visible positive disruptions to improve school health can act as a catalyst for wider school health promotion efforts. Conditions to create a positive disruption are enough time, and sufficient bottom-up involvement, external support, team cohesion and coordination. The focus should be on each specific school, as each school has their own starting point and process of change.

trial registrationThe study was retrospectively registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov database on 14 June 2016 (NCT02800616).

Indexed as

Health Services ResearchProcess Assessment, Health CareProgram EvaluationChildFemaleHealth BehaviorHumansMaleNetherlandsRetrospective StudiesSchool Health ServicesSchoolsSurveys and QuestionnairesAction researchComplex systemsContextImplementationMixed methodsSchool health promotion

Identifiers

PMID31170941
PMCPMC6554901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.