ArticleFuture oncology (London, England)2019
Intensity of chemotherapy for the initial management of newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia in older patients.
Article in Future oncology (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intensive versus less-intensive antileukemic therapy in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia: A systematic review.PloS one · 2021Pooled it
- A Phase II Trial of Geriatric Assessment-Guided Selection of Treatment Intensity in Older Adults With AML.American journal of hematology · 2025Trial
- Efficacy of 10-day decitabine in acute myeloid leukemia.Leukemia research · 2021Trial
- Geriatric hematology research at the 2019 American Society of Hematology annual meeting: Young International Society of geriatric oncology perspective paper.Journal of geriatric oncology · 2020Article
- Survival of Older Adults With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Effect of Using Multiagent Versus Single-agent Chemotherapy.Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.