ArticleIET systems biology2019
Cancer adjuvant chemotherapy prediction model for non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in IET systems biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of a prognostic prediction model incorporatingJournal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Deep gene selection method to select genes from microarray datasets for cancer classification.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most popular and dangerous type of lung cancer. Adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) is the main treatment after surgery resection to prevent the patient from cancer recurrence. However, ACT could be toxic and unhelpful in some cases. Therefore, it is highly desired in clinical applications to predict the treatment outcomes of chemotherapy. Conventional methods of predicting cancer treatment rely solely on histopathology and the results are not reliable in some cases. This study aims at building a predictive model to identify who needs ACT treatment and who should avoid it. To this end, the authors propose an innovative method to identify NSCLC-related prognostic genes from microarray gene-expression datasets. They also propose a new model using gene-expression programming algorithm for ACT classification. The proposed model was evaluated on integrated microarray datasets from four institutes and compared with four representative methods: general regression neural network, decision tree, support vector machine and naive Bayes. Evaluation results demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed model with accuracy 89.8% which is higher than other representative models. They obtained four probes (four genes) that can get good prediction results. These genes are 204891_s_at (LCK), 208893_s_at (DUSP6), 202454_s_at (ERBB3) and 201076_at (MMD).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.