Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31170222›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Glucosinolate variability between turnip organs during development.

Guusje Bonnema, Jun Gu Lee, Wang Shuhang, David Lagarrigue, Johan Bucher, Ron Wehrens, Ric de Vos, Jules Beekwilder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Metabolomic and Transcriptomic Profiles in DiverseJournal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Selection of superior accessions of turnip (Food science & nutrition · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Guusje BonnemaPlant Breeding, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Jun Gu LeeDepartment of Horticulture, College of Agriculture & Life Sciences, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju, Korea.
Wang ShuhangPlant Breeding, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3720-6200
David LagarriguePlant Breeding, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Johan BucherPlant Breeding, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Ron WehrensWageningen Plant Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Ric de VosWageningen Plant Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Jules BeekwilderWageningen Plant Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3238-4427

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Turnip (Brassica rapa spp. rapa) is an important vegetable species, with a unique physiology. Several plant parts, including both the turnip tubers and leaves, are important for human consumption. During the development of turnip plants, the leaves function as metabolic source tissues, while the tuber first functions as a sink, while later the tuber turns into a source for development of flowers and seeds. In the present study, chemical changes were determined for two genotypes with different genetic background, and included seedling, young leaves, mature leaves, tuber surface, tuber core, stalk, flower and seed tissues, at seven different time points during plant development. As a basis for understanding changes in glucosinolates during plant development, the profile of glucosinolates was analysed using liquid chromatography (LC) coupled to mass spectrometry (MS). This analysis was complemented by a gene expression analysis, focussed on GLS biosynthesis, which could explain part of the observed variation, pointing to important roles of specific gene orthologues for defining the chemical differences. Substantial differences in glucosinolate profiles were observed between above-ground tissues and turnip tuber, reflecting the differences in physiological role. In addition, differences between the two genotypes and between tissues that were harvested early or late during the plant lifecycle. The importance of the observed differences in glucosinolate profile for the ecophysiology of the turnip and for breeding turnips with optimal chemical profiles is discussed.

Indexed as

OrganogenesisBrassica napusCrosses, GeneticGene Expression Regulation, PlantGenes, PlantGenotypeGlucosinolatesMetabolic Networks and PathwaysMethionineOrgan SpecificityPlant ProteinsPrincipal Component AnalysisGlucosinolatesMethioninePlant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID31170222
PMCPMC6553741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.