Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31170177›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

The numerical classification and grading standards of daylily (Hemerocallis) flower color.

Huliang Cui, Yanan Zhang, Xiaolu Shi, Feifei Gong, Xiong Xiong, Xiuping Kang, Guoming Xing, Sen Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Revealing the Mechanism ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Characterization ofFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The complete chloroplast genome sequence ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Huliang CuiCollege of Horticulture, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6180-5510
Yanan ZhangCollege of Horticulture, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, China.
Xiaolu ShiCollege of Horticulture, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, China.
Feifei GongCollege of Horticulture, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, China.
Xiong XiongCollege of Horticulture, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, China.
Xiuping KangCollege of Horticulture, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, China.
Guoming XingCollege of Horticulture, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, China.
Sen LiCollege of Horticulture, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study collected 183 Hemerocallis varieties to conduct numerical classification of flower color and provide valuable baseline data and foundational theory for normalization and precision of Hemerocallis. The color CIELab phenotypes were collected via colorimeter (CR-10 Plus), which separately measured three sepal and petal parts (throat, eye and limb). The colors of experimental samples were artificially named by the Royal Horticultural Society Colour Chart (RHSCC). All the data were analyzed using R software. The results showed that the throat was predominantly green-yellow, light yellow and yellow; green-yellow accounted for the largest proportion of sepals (67.76%) and petals (69.40%). The eye was more abundant, and there were significant differences between sepals and petals. The limb was clustered into five color groups (orange, yellow, pink, red and purple); the yellow group had the most varieties for both sepals and petals, containing 57.38% and 55.74%, respectively. Both sepals and petals had significant differences (p<0.0001) in color (△E), redness (a*) and color angle (h) for the throat, eye and limb. However, the difference in CIELab phenotypes between the eye and limb were not significant. According to "Dual Classification", the color classification standard was proposed as a 3-level standard. The color of sepal and petal consistency served as the first standard, and the color of limb was the second standard. The color pattern types of pure, gradual change, watermark and eye spot, served as the third standard. It has been proposed that all the 183 experimental varieties were divided into two categories, five groups and finally four types. This study provides a classification basis and reference for numeric and standardized color phenotype description for Hemerocallis.

Indexed as

PigmentationFlowersHemerocallisPhenotype

Identifiers

PMID31170177
PMCPMC6553707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.