Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31170169›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Is high aerobic workload at work associated with leisure time physical activity and sedentary behaviour among blue-collar workers? A compositional data analysis based on accelerometer data.

Charlotte Lund Rasmussen, Javier Palarea-Albaladejo, Mette Korshøj, Nidhi Gupta, Kirsten Nabe-Nielsen, Andreas Holtermann, Marie Birk Jørgensen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cardiovascular load and physical capacity in older workers engaged in physically demanding occupations.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Charlotte Lund RasmussenNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2193-5019
Javier Palarea-AlbaladejoBiomathematics and Statistics Scotland, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0162-669X
Mette KorshøjNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Nidhi GuptaNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Kirsten Nabe-NielsenNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Andreas HoltermannNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Marie Birk JørgensenDepartment of Forensic Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DKNational Research Centre for the Working Environment · DKBiomathematics and Statistics Scotland · GBUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to investigate the hypothesized negative association between duration of work time spent at a high relative aerobic workload and leisure time movement behaviours among blue-collar workers.

methodsThis was a cross-sectional study based on heart rate and accelerometer data from 803 blue-collar workers (447 men and 356 women). Relative aerobic workload was measured as percentage of heart rate reserve during work (%HRR). Leisure time movement behaviours were expressed in terms of leisure time spent in sedentary and active behaviours in uninterrupted bouts (i.e. <10 min, ≥10-30 min and >30 min). Compositional regression and isotemporal substitution models were used to assess the association between the predominance of work time spent at ≥40%HRR and leisure time spent in sedentary and active bouts. All analyses were stratified by sex.

resultsFor men, there was no statistically significant association between the predominance of work time spent at ≥40%HRR and leisure time movement behaviours. Among women, the predominance of ≥40%HRR at work was negatively associated with relative leisure time spent in ≥10 min bouts of active behaviour ([Formula: see text] = -0.21, p = 0.02) and a theoretical 15 min reallocation of work time from <40%HRR to ≥40%HRR was estimated to decrease active behaviour by 6 min during leisure time.

conclusionOur result highlights the need for considering work-related barriers for an active leisure time in high-risk populations. Longitudinal studies are warranted to disentangle the relationship between physically demanding work characteristics and leisure time movement behaviours in such populations.

Indexed as

AccelerometryExerciseLeisure ActivitiesSedentary BehaviorWorkloadAdultAerobiosisAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOccupationsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31170169
PMCPMC6553845
OpenAlexW2973300891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.