Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31170060›Full record

ArticleMicrobial genomics2019

Not all Pseudomonas aeruginosa are equal: strains from industrial sources possess uniquely large multireplicon genomes.

Rebecca Weiser, Angharad E Green, Matthew J Bull, Edward Cunningham-Oakes, Keith A Jolley, Martin C J Maiden, Amanda J Hall, Craig Winstanley, Andrew J Weightman, Denise Donoghue and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial genomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Transcriptomic profiling ofMicrobial genomics · 2025
    Article
  3. Detection of the ST111 Global High-RiskCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Genomic characterization ofMicrobial genomics · 2025
    Article
  5. Carbapenem-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Eco-evolutionary dynamics of experimentalMicrobiology (Reading, England) · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. What makes a megaplasmid?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Rebecca WeiserMicrobiomes, Microbes and Informatics Group, Organisms and Environment Division, Cardiff School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK.
Angharad E GreenMicrobiomes, Microbes and Informatics Group, Organisms and Environment Division, Cardiff School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK.
Matthew J BullMicrobiomes, Microbes and Informatics Group, Organisms and Environment Division, Cardiff School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK.
Edward Cunningham-OakesMicrobiomes, Microbes and Informatics Group, Organisms and Environment Division, Cardiff School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK.
Keith A JolleyDepartment of Zoology, The Tinbergen Building, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Martin C J MaidenDepartment of Zoology, The Tinbergen Building, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Amanda J HallUniversity of Liverpool, Institute of Infection and Global Health, Liverpool, UK.
Craig WinstanleyUniversity of Liverpool, Institute of Infection and Global Health, Liverpool, UK.
Andrew J WeightmanMicrobiomes, Microbes and Informatics Group, Organisms and Environment Division, Cardiff School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK.
Denise DonoghueUnilever Research and Development, Port Sunlight, Wirral, UK.
Alejandro AmezquitaUnilever Research and Development, Safety and Environmental Assurance Centre, Colworth House, Sharnbrook, Bedford, UK.
Thomas R ConnorMicrobiomes, Microbes and Informatics Group, Organisms and Environment Division, Cardiff School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK.
Eshwar MahenthiralingamMicrobiomes, Microbes and Informatics Group, Organisms and Environment Division, Cardiff School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/F016557/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L502078/1/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M009122/1Medical Research Council MR/L015080/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a highly versatile, antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative bacterium known for causing opportunistic infections and contamination of industrial products. Despite extensive genomic analysis of clinical P. aeruginosa strains, no genomes exist for preservative-tolerant industrial strains. A unique collection of 69 industrial isolates was assembled and compared to clinical and environmental strains; 16 genetically distinct industrial strains were subjected to array tube genotyping, multilocus sequence typing and whole-genome sequencing. The industrial strains possessed high preservative tolerance and were dispersed widely across P. aeruginosa as a species, but recurrence of strains from the same lineage within specific industrial products and locations was identified. The industrial P. aeruginosa genomes (mean=7.0 Mb) were significantly larger than those of previously sequenced environmental (mean=6.5 Mb; n=19) and clinical (mean=6.6 Mb; n=66) strains. Complete sequencing of the P. aeruginosa industrial strain RW109, which encoded the largest genome (7.75 Mb), revealed a multireplicon structure including a megaplasmid (555 265 bp) and large plasmid (151 612 bp). The RW109 megaplasmid represented an emerging plasmid family conserved in seven industrial and two clinical P. aeruginosa strains, and associated with extremely stress-resilient phenotypes, including antimicrobial resistance and solvent tolerance. Here, by defining the detailed phylogenomics of P. aeruginosa industrial strains, we show that they uniquely possess multireplicon, megaplasmid-bearing genomes, and significantly greater genomic content worthy of further study.

Indexed as

DNA, BacterialDrug Resistance, BacterialGenome, BacterialHumansIndustrial MicrobiologyPhylogenyPlasmidsPseudomonas aeruginosaPseudomonas InfectionsRepliconWhole Genome SequencingDNA, Bacterialcontaminationindustry microbiologymegaplasmidsphylogenomicsPseudomonas aeruginosa

Identifiers

PMID31170060
PMCPMC6700666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.