ArticleMedicine2019
Relationship between CXC chemokine receptor 4 expression and prognostic significance in acute myeloid leukemia.
Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between the Wilms tumor-1 rs16754 polymorphism and acute myeloid leukemia: A MOOSE-compliant meta-analysis.Medicine · 2020Pooled it
- CXCR4 antagonistic lipid nanoparticles loading siRNA combat refractory AML through AML1-ETO depletion and homoharringtonine sensitization.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Metabolic and epigenetic interplay in HSPC specification: A balance between extrinsic and intrinsic cues.iScience · 2026Review
- Construction and Validation of an N7-Methylguanosine-Related Prognostic Model for Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Blood and lymphatic cancer : targets and therapy · 2026Article
- Review
- Immune Escape of Acute Myeloid Leukemia after Transplantation.Blood cancer discovery · 2025Review
- Relapse of acute myeloid leukemia after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: immune escape mechanisms and current implications for therapy.Molecular cancer · 2023Review
- T22-PE24-H6 Nanotoxin Selectively Kills CXCR4-High Expressing AML Patient Cells In Vitro and Potently Blocks Dissemination In Vivo.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- Resveratrol and Its Role in the Management of B-Cell Malignancies-A Recent Update.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Upregulation of hsa-miR-625-5p Inhibits Invasion of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Cancer Cells through ILK/AKT Pathway.Cell journal · 2022Article
- Acute Myeloid Leukemia Mutations and Future Mechanistic Target to Overcome Resistance.Current treatment options in oncology · 2021Review
- Association of SDF-1 Gene Polymorphism with Increased Risk of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2021Article
- Location First: Targeting Acute Myeloid Leukemia Within Its Niche.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Review
- Targeting CXCR4 in AML and ALL.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
CXC chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) expression on acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells correlated with stromal cell derived factor-1α (SDF-1α) and retained hematopoietic progenitors and leukemia cells within the bone marrow microenvironment. Here, we examined CXCR4 expression in 134 de novo AML and 21 controls by flow cytometry, evaluated the relationship between CXCR4 expression and clinical characteristics, and elucidated the prognostic significance of CXCR4 expression in AML prospectively. We found that the CXCR4 expression was significantly higher in AML patients than controls (P = .000). One hundred thirty four cases of de novo AML patients were divided into 2 groups according to the median of CXCR4 relative fluorescence intensity (RFI). CXCR4 high group (RFI >4.23) had markedly shorter overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) than CXCR4 low group (RFI ≤4.23) in 106 AML patients who received chemotherapy (P = .002; .026, respectively). Furthermore, in the 87 non-M3 patients who received induction therapy, there was a significant decrease for OS but not for DFS in the CXCR4 high group (P = .047 and .178, respectively). Moreover, high levels of CXCR4 expression independently increased the risk of relapse in both all AML and non-M3 patients who achieved complete remission (CR) after chemotherapy (odds ratio = 1.090, P = .010; odds ratio = 1.068, P = .048, respectively). Collectively, our data suggest that CXCR4 overexpression was an independent prognostic factor for disease relapse and poorer OS in both all AML and non-M3 patients. CXCR4 expression levels can be determined at disease presentation by the flow rapidly and easily. As such, CXCR4 could be used as a potential therapeutic target in AML patients with poor prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.