Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31169685›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2019

The cumulative venous thromboembolism incidence and risk factors in intensive care patients receiving the guideline-recommended thromboprophylaxis.

Chuanlin Zhang, Zeju Zhang, Jie Mi, Xueqin Wang, Yujun Zou, Xiaoya Chen, Zhi Nie, Xinyi Luo, Ruiying Gan

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [S3 guideline on sepsis-prevention, diagnosis, therapy, and follow-up care-update 2025].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2025
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Chuanlin ZhangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University.
Zeju ZhangSchool of Nursing, Chongqing Medical and Pharmaceutical College, Chongqing, PR China.
Jie MiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University.
Xueqin WangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University.
Yujun ZouDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University.
Xiaoya ChenDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University.
Zhi NieDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University.
Xinyi LuoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University.
Ruiying GanDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Few prospective studies have reported the cumulative incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in the intensive care unit (ICU), especially for patients receiving guideline-recommended VTE prophylaxis. We aimed to design a prospective observational study to investigate the cumulative incidence and risk factors of ICU-acquired VTE for those populations.We prospectively studied 281 consecutively included patients in the ICU at a single center. All patients provided informed consent. Patients received ultrasound evaluation and were followed for VTE before ICU discharge or within 28 days of ICU stay. The type of VTE thromboprophylaxis was also recorded for all patients. Variables from univariate analyses that were associated with VTE were included in the binary logistic regression analysis to determine VTE predictors. The cumulative VTE incidence with 95% confidence interval (CI) was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods.Patients had a median age of 60 years (range, 18-89) and an acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score of 17 (range, 4-36). Despite all patients receiving guideline-recommended thromboprophylaxis, the cumulative incidence of VTE at 7, 14, 21, and 28 days was 4.45% (95% CI 2.55-7.71), 7.14% (95% CI 4.61-10.97), 7.53% (95% CI 4.92-11.43), and 9.55% (95% CI 6.55-13.81), respectively. Central venous catheter use (P = .002, odds ratio [OR] = 4.50), Caprini score (P = .012, OR = 1.20), and ICU length of stay (P = .006, OR = 1.08) were independent risk factors related to the incidence of VTE for patients admitted to the ICU.Our prospective observational study found that the 28-day cumulative incidence of VTE was relatively high for patients admitted to the ICU, despite the use of guideline-recommended thromboprophylaxis. Patients with femoral central venous catheter, prolonged ICU length of stay, or a high Caprini score may have an increased risk of developing VTE.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnticoagulantsAPACHECritical CareFemaleHumansIncidenceIntensive Care UnitsKaplan-Meier EstimateLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioAnticoagulants

Identifiers

PMID31169685
PMCPMC6571428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.