Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31169495›Full record

ArticleeLife2019

Post-decision processing in primate prefrontal cortex influences subsequent choices on an auditory decision-making task.

Joji Tsunada, Yale Cohen, Joshua I Gold

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Distinct Cortical Populations Drive Multisensory Modulation of Segregated Auditory Sources.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Dopaminergic computations for perceptual decisions.Current opinion in behavioral sciences · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Sensory choices as logistic classification.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joji TsunadaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9125-7578
Yale Cohen *Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0830-5162
Joshua I Gold *Department of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6018-0483

Funding

Representations of sound processing in the auditory cortexR01DC009224 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI COHEN, YALE E · 2008 to 2018
$3.1M
CRCNS: Decision Making in Changing EnvironmentsR01MH115557 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GOLD, JOSHUA I, JOSIC, KRESIMIR · 2017 to 2020
$1.6M
The Impact of Frequency Compression on Cortical Evoked Potentials and PerceptionF31DC012961 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI KIRBY, BENJAMIN J · 2012 to 2013
$54k
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology Leading Initiative for Excellent Young Researchers (1071421)NEI NIH HHS MH115557NIDCD NIH HHS DC009224NIDCD NIH HHS DC012961NIDCD NIH HHS F31 DC012961NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009224NIMH NIH HHS MH115557NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH115557
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perceptual decisions do not occur in isolation but instead reflect ongoing evaluation and adjustment processes that can affect future decisions. However, the neuronal substrates of these across-decision processes are not well understood, particularly for auditory decisions. We measured and manipulated the activity of choice-selective neurons in the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (vlPFC) while monkeys made decisions about the frequency content of noisy auditory stimuli. As the decision was being formed, vlPFC activity was not modulated strongly by the task. However, after decision commitment, vlPFC population activity encoded the sensory evidence, choice, and outcome of the current trial and predicted subject-specific choice biases on the subsequent trial. Consistent with these patterns of neuronal activity, electrical microstimulation in vlPFC tended to affect the subsequent, but not current, decision. Thus, distributed post-commitment representations of graded decision-related information in prefrontal cortex can play a causal role in evaluating past decisions and biasing subsequent ones.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationDecision MakingTask Performance and AnalysisAlgorithmsAnimalsChoice BehaviorElectric StimulationMacaca mulattaMaleNeuronsPrefrontal Cortexauditorydecision-makingneuroscienceprefrontal cortexrhesus macaque

Identifiers

PMID31169495
PMCPMC6570479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.