ArticleNeural regeneration research2019
Differences in pathological changes between two rat models of severe traumatic brain injury.
Article in Neural regeneration research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nano-scaffold containing functional motif of stromal cell-derived factor 1 enhances neural stem cell behavior and synaptogenesis in traumatic brain injury.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Cannabidiol alleviates the inflammatory response in rats with traumatic brain injury through the PGEActa biochimica et biophysica Sinica · 2025Article
- Fingolimod improves diffuse brain injury by promoting AQP4 polarization and functional recovery of the glymphatic system.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2024Article
- Acute and Reversible Hypothalamic Symptoms in a Lateral Head Impact Mouse Model of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.Neurotrauma reports · 2024Article
- Comparison between premortem histopathology findings in rats with and without traumatic brain injury: prospective application in forensic medicine.F1000Research · 2023Article
- Human ESC-derived immunity- and matrix- regulatory cells ameliorated white matter damage and vascular cognitive impairment in rats subjected to chronic cerebral hypoperfusion.Cell proliferation · 2022Article
- Spatial and temporal dynamics of HDACs class IIa following mild traumatic brain injury in adult rats.Molecular psychiatry · 2022Article
- Genome-wide interrogation of transfer RNA-derived small RNAs in a mouse model of traumatic brain injury.Neural regeneration research · 2022Article
- MicroRNA miR-126 attenuates brain injury in septic rats via NF-κB signaling pathway.Bioengineered · 2021Article
- Comparative transcriptomic analysis of ratNeural regeneration research · 2021Article
- Adrenomedullin: an important participant in neurological diseases.Neural regeneration research · 2020Review
- Fingolimod (FTY720) improves postoperative cognitive dysfunction in mice subjected to D-galactose-induced aging.Neural regeneration research · 2020Article
- Modeling Controlled Cortical Impact Injury in 3D Brain-Like Tissue Cultures.Advanced healthcare materials · 2020Article
- Translational Genomics in Neurocritical Care: a Review.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rat high-impact free weight drop model mimics the diffuse axonal injury caused by severe traumatic brain injury in humans, while severe controlled cortical impact can produce a severe traumatic brain injury model using precise strike parameters. In this study, we compare the pathological mechanisms and pathological changes between two rat severe brain injury models to identify the similarities and differences. The severe controlled cortical impact model was produced by an electronic controlled cortical impact device, while the severe free weight drop model was produced by dropping a 500 g free weight from a height of 1.8 m through a plastic tube. Body temperature and mortality were recorded, and neurological deficits were assessed with the modified neurological severity score. Brain edema and blood-brain barrier damage were evaluated by assessing brain water content and Evans blue extravasation. In addition, a cytokine array kit was used to detect inflammatory cytokines. Neuronal apoptosis in the brain and brainstem was quantified by immunofluorescence staining. Both the severe controlled cortical impact and severe free weight drop models exhibited significant neurological impairments and body temperature fluctuations. More severe motor dysfunction was observed in the severe controlled cortical impact model, while more severe cognitive dysfunction was observed in the severe free weight drop model. Brain edema, inflammatory cytokine changes and cortical neuronal apoptosis were more substantial and blood-brain barrier damage was more focal in the severe controlled cortical impact group compared with the severe free weight drop group. The severe free weight drop model presented with more significant apoptosis in the brainstem and diffused blood-brain barrier damage, with higher mortality and lower repeatability compared with the severe controlled cortical impact group. Severe brainstem damage was not found in the severe controlled cortical impact model. These results indicate that the severe controlled cortical impact model is relatively more stable, more reproducible, and shows obvious cerebral pathological changes at an earlier stage. Therefore, the severe controlled cortical impact model is likely more suitable for studies on severe focal traumatic brain injury, while the severe free weight drop model may be more apt for studies on diffuse axonal injury. All experimental procedures were approved by the Ethics Committee of Animal Experiments of Tianjin Medical University, China (approval No. IRB2012-028-02) in February 2012.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.