Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31168939›Full record

ArticleObesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity2019

A scoping review and systematic mapping of health promotion interventions associated with obesity in Islamic religious settings in the UK.

Kiran K Rai, Sufyan Abid Dogra, Sally Barber, Peymane Adab, Carolyn Summerbell, “Childhood Obesity Prevention in Islamic Religious Settings' Programme Management Group”

Open access · bronzeAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interventions for preventing obesity in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Leaders like us: landscape of physical activity leadership programmes for underserved young women in England.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Child and adolescent obesity.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2023
    Review
  9. Exploring the obesity concerns of British Pakistani women living in deprived inner-city areas: A qualitative study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. A scoping review and systematic mapping of health promotion interventions associated with obesity in Islamic religious settings in the UK.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kiran K RaiInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3250-0275
Sufyan Abid DograBradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9896-9503
Sally BarberBradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK.
Peymane AdabInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Carolyn SummerbellDepartment of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Durham University, Durham, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1910-9383
“Childhood Obesity Prevention in Islamic Religious Settings' Programme Management Group”
Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBDurham University · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/J000248/1Medical Research Council MR/K02325X/1Medical Research Council MR/P008941/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Islamic religious settings (IRS) may be useful places to implement obesity interventions for Muslims. However, little is known about the level and nature of such activity in these settings. We searched bibliographic databases and grey literature, and requested grey information from Muslim organizations, local councils, and mosques in 13 selected areas in the United Kingdom. Thirty-five interventions were identified; most were poorly described and not evaluated. Twenty-seven interventions focused on physical activity behaviours, four on diet behaviours, one on both behaviours, and seven addressed long-term conditions associated with obesity. Most interventions were led by volunteers from the congregation/faith leaders and were funded through donations from congregants or charity organizations. The evidence suggests that health promotion interventions in IRS have a relatively high reach. Obesity interventions are commonly delivered in UK IRS. Most target physical activity behaviours, are instigated and led by volunteers from the congregation or faith leaders, receive no public funding, and are only recorded in people's memories. High-quality evaluations of well-specified interventions in this context are needed. We suggest that the methods used in this review, including the learning around positionality of researchers, could be adopted by other researchers as a way to locate opportunities for effective community-level interventions.

Indexed as

IslamEvidence-Based PracticeHealth BehaviorHealth PromotionHumansObesityProgram EvaluationReligion and MedicineUnited Kingdomhealth promotioninterventionsIslamic religious settingsobesity

Identifiers

PMID31168939
PMCPMC6851982
OpenAlexW2953635745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.