SynthesisAdvances in therapy2019
Economic Impact of Non-Medical Switching from Originator Biologics to Biosimilars: A Systematic Literature Review.
Synthesis in Advances in therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Discontinuation and Switchback After Non-Medical Switching from Originator Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNF) Inhibitors to Biosimilars: A Meta-Analysis of Real-World Studies from 2012 to 2018.Advances in therapy · 2022Pooled it
- The Economic Impact of Originator-to-Biosimilar Non-medical Switching in the Real-World Setting: A Systematic Literature Review.Advances in therapy · 2022Pooled it
- Article
- Did a Non-Medical Biosimilar Switching Policy Cause an Increase in Non-Biologic/Biosimilar Health Care Resource Utilization or Cost in Patients With Inflammatory Arthritis?Arthritis care & research · 2026Article
- Temporal Trends in the Prescription of Biosimilars and the Status of Switching from Original Biologics to Biosimilars at Individual and Institutional Levels in Japan.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2025Article
- Does the introduction of an infliximab biosimilar always result in savings for hospitals? A descriptive study using real-world data.Health economics review · 2024Article
- Counting the costs: a nationwide study on healthcare use following an adalimumab biosimilar switch in >1300 inflammatory arthritis patients.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2024Article
- Practical Management of Biosimilar Use in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD): A Global Survey and an International Delphi Consensus.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Monitoring a Mandatory Nonmedical Switching Policy from Originator to Biosimilar Infliximab in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Population-Based Cohort Study.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2023Article
- Real-world evidence of the use of the infliximab biosimilar SB2: data from the PERFUSE study.Rheumatology advances in practice · 2023Article
- Exploring the Reasons Behind the Substantial Discontinuation Rate Among Patients Taking CT-P13 in a Large Tertiary Hospital in Western Switzerland: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using Routinely Collected Medical Data.Drugs - real world outcomes · 2022Article
- Patient perspectives of successful adalimumab biosimilar transitioning in Crohn's disease: an interview study.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2022Article
- The Great Debate With IBD Biosimilars: Con: Biosimilars Should Not Be Routinely Used as a First Line Biologic and Not Switched From Reference Biologics.Crohn's & colitis 360 · 2021Review
- Switching and Discontinuation Patterns Among Patients Stable on Originator Infliximab Who Switched to an Infliximab Biosimilar or Remained on Originator Infliximab.Biologics : targets & therapy · 2021Article
- The Argument Against a Biosimilar Switch Policy for Infliximab in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease Living in Alberta.Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2020Article
- The Importance of Countering Biosimilar Disparagement and Misinformation.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2020Article
- Impact of Pharmacy Benefit Managers on Oncology Practices and Patients.JCO oncology practice · 2020Review
- The Future of Biosimilars: Maximizing Benefits Across Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases.Drugs · 2020Review
- Real-World Patient Experience of Switching Biologic Treatment in Inflammatory Arthritis and Ulcerative Colitis - A Systematic Literature Review.Patient preference and adherence · 2020Review
- Considerations for the US health-system pharmacist in a world of biosimilars.Drugs in context · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionA systematic literature review was conducted to review and summarize the economic impact of non-medical switching (NMS) from biologic originators to their biosimilars (i.e., switching a patient's medication for reasons irrelevant to the patient's health).
methodsEnglish publications reporting healthcare resource utilization (HRU) or costs associated with biosimilar NMS were searched in PubMed and EMBASE over the past 10 years and from selected scientific conferences over the past 3 years, along with gray literature for all biologics with an approved biosimilar (e.g., tumor-necrosis factor inhibitors, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, insulin and hormone therapies).
resultsA total of 1311 publications were retrieved, where 54 studies met the selection criteria. Seventeen studies reported increased real-world HRU or costs related to biosimilar NMS, e.g., higher rates of surgery (11%), steroid use (13%) and biosimilar dose escalating (6-35.4%). Among the studies that the estimated cost impact associated with NMS, 33 reported drug costs reduction, 12 reported healthcare costs post-NMS without a detailed breakdown, and 5 reported NMS setup and managing costs. Cost estimation/simulation studies demonstrated the cost reduction associated with NMS. However, variation across studies was substantial because of heterogeneity in study designs and assumptions (e.g., disease areas, scenarios of drug price discount rates, cost components, population size, study period, etc.).
conclusionReal-world studies reporting the economic impact of biosimilar NMS separately from drug costs are emerging, and those that reported such results found increased HRU in patients with biosimilar NMS. Studies of cost estimation have been largely limited to drug prices. Comprehensive evaluation of the economic impact of NMS should incorporate all important elements of healthcare service needs such as drug price, biologic rebates, HRU, NMS program setup, administration and monitoring costs.
fundingAbbVie.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.