Trial reportArchives of osteoporosis2019
Increased bone mineral density for 1 year of romosozumab, vs placebo, followed by 2 years of denosumab in the Japanese subgroup of the pivotal FRAME trial and extension.
Trial report in Archives of osteoporosis, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01575834 (A Multicenter, International, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Romosozumab Treatment in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multicenter, International, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Romosozumab Treatment in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- Romosozumab's Effect on Bone Mineral Density in Patients with Osteoporosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Current medicinal chemistry · 2026Pooled it
- Executive summary: Italian guidelines for diagnosis, risk stratification, and care continuity of fragility fractures 2021.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Pooled it
- The effects of abaloparatide on hip geometry and biomechanical properties in Japanese osteoporotic patients assessed using DXA-based hip structural analysis: results of the Japanese phase 3 ACTIVE-J trial.Archives of osteoporosis · 2023Trial
- Romosozumab followed by denosumab in Japanese women with high fracture risk in the FRAME trial.Journal of bone and mineral metabolism · 2021Trial
- Romosozumab in Postmenopausal Korean Women with Osteoporosis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Efficacy and Safety Study.Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea) · 2021Trial
- Romosozumab or alendronate for fracture prevention in East Asian patients: a subanalysis of the phase III, randomized ARCH study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2020Trial
- Equivalent Twelve-Month Bone Mineral Density Response to Romosozumab in Patients Aged ≥ 85 Years and < 85 Years: A Multi-center Real-World Cohort Study (n = 417) from Northern Japan.Calcified tissue international · 2026Article
- Cardiovascular Safety of Romosozumab Versus Other Anti-Osteoporosis Medications in Patients with Osteoporosis: A Nationwide Health Insurance Claims Database Study in Japan.Calcified tissue international · 2026Article
- Article
- Comparative safety of denosumab and romosozumab in osteoporosis: an analysis based on the FDA adverse event reporting system database.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Romosozumab Enhances Implant Stability in Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporotic Bone: A Rabbit Model Study.Neurospine · 2025Article
- Effective management of pregnancy- and lactation-associated osteoporosis using romosozumab: a clinical case report.JBMR plus · 2025Article
- The Diagnosis and Therapy of Osteoporosis in Gaucher Disease.Calcified tissue international · 2025Review
- Treatment effects, adverse outcomes and cardiovascular safety of romosozumab - Existing worldwide data: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2024Review
- Effectiveness of romosozumab in patients with osteoporosis at high fracture risk: a Japanese real-world study.Journal of bone and mineral metabolism · 2024Article
- The Effects of Switch Therapy in Osteoporosis Treatment after Romosozumab after Comparing with Prior Treatment.Journal of osteoporosis · 2024Article
- The sequential antifracturative treatment: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2024Article
- Marked increase in bone mineral density with oral phosphate and calcitriol in tumour-induced osteomalacia.BMJ case reports · 2023Article
- Comparison of the Efficacy of Romosozumab and Teriparatide for the Management of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures.Neurospine · 2023Article
- Romosozumab in osteoporosis: yesterday, today and tomorrow.Journal of translational medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Romosozumab, which binds sclerostin, rebuilds the skeletal foundation before transitioning to antiresorptive treatment. This subgroup analysis of an international, randomized, double-blind study in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis showed efficacy and safety outcomes for romosozumab followed by denosumab in Japanese women were generally consistent with those for the overall population. PURPOSE: In the international, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 FRActure study, in postmenopausal woMen with ostEoporosis (FRAME; NCT01575834), romosozumab followed by denosumab significantly improved bone mineral density (BMD) and reduced fracture risk. This report evaluates Japanese women in FRAME.
methodsPostmenopausal women with osteoporosis (T-score - 3.5 to - 2.5 at total hip or femoral neck) received romosozumab 210 mg or placebo subcutaneously monthly for 12 months, then each group received denosumab 60 mg subcutaneously every 6 months for 24 months. The key endpoint for Japanese women was BMD change. Other endpoints included new vertebral, clinical, and nonvertebral fracture; the subgroup analysis did not have adequate power to demonstrate statistically significant reductions.
resultsOf 7180 enrolled subjects, 492 (6.9%) were Japanese (247 romosozumab, 245 placebo). BMD increases from baseline were greater (P < 0.001) for romosozumab-to-denosumab than placebo-to-denosumab at the lumbar spine (36 months, 12.7%), total hip (4.2%), and femoral neck (4.1%). Fracture risk was lower through 36 months for romosozumab-to-denosumab vs placebo-to-denosumab for new vertebral (1.7% vs 4.5%; relative risk reduction (RRR) 63%, P = 0.070), clinical (3.2% vs 7.3%; RRR 53%, P = 0.072), nonvertebral (2.8% vs 6.1%; RRR 50%, P = 0.12), and all other fracture types evaluated. Rates of adverse events and positively adjudicated serious cardiovascular events were generally balanced between groups.
conclusionsEfficacy and safety for romosozumab-to-denosumab were similar between Japanese women and the overall population. The sequence of romosozumab to rebuild the skeletal foundation before transitioning to antiresorptive treatment with denosumab is a promising regimen for Japanese postmenopausal women with osteoporosis at high risk of fracture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.