ArticleThe Russell Sage Foundation journal of the social sciences : RSF2019
Understanding Vulnerable Families in Multiple Service Systems Understanding Vulnerable Families.
Article in The Russell Sage Foundation journal of the social sciences : RSF, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- 10 Year Longitudinal Evaluation of the Spilstead Model of Milieu Intervention.Journal of child & adolescent trauma · 2023Article
- It Takes a Village to Raise a Child: Understanding and Expanding the Concept of the "Village".Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Using Administrative Data for Social Science and Policy.The Russell Sage Foundation journal of the social sciences : RSF · 2019Article
- Using Administrative Data for Social Science and Policy.The Russell Sage Foundation journal of the social sciences : RSF · 2019Article
- Civil Society Goes to School: Parent-Teacher Associations and the Equality of Educational Opportunity.The Russell Sage Foundation journal of the social sciences : RSF · 2019Article
- Facilitators and Barriers in Integrated Social Care for Families Facing Multiple and Complex Problems: A Scoping Review.International journal of integrated careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We analyze Illinois families facing multiple barriers and their interactions with public-sector services. Using administrative data from five state agencies to identify families' receipt of child welfare, mental health, and substance abuse services as well as adult and juvenile incarcerations, we identify individuals across systems using probabilistic record-linkage techniques, defining family clusters based on networks of individuals who share child welfare and food stamp cases. We show that 23 percent receive services in two or more of these areas. This concentration accounts for 86 percent of the funding for these services used by the entire sample. They experience more and more severe problems. This population is otherwise heterogeneous, engaging with different types of services and clustered in certain parts of the state.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.