Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31168456›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2019

Long-term impact of prognostic nutritional index in cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients undergoing definitive radiotherapy.

Yaqing Dai, Xiaobin Fu, Tingting Li, Qiwei Yao, Liyu Su, Huiyan Su, Jiancheng Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Nutritional management during chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy for advanced esophageal cancer.Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yaqing DaiDepartmen of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital & Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou 350014, China.
Xiaobin FuDepartmen of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital & Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou 350014, China.
Tingting LiDepartmen of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou 362000, China.
Qiwei YaoDepartmen of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital & Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou 350014, China.
Liyu SuDepartmen of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital & Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou 350014, China.
Huiyan SuDepartmen of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital & Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou 350014, China.
Jiancheng LiDepartmen of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital & Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou 350014, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prognostic nutritional index (PNI) has been found to have prognostic value in several cancers, and we aimed to determine its predictive value for the long-term prognosis of cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (CESCC) patients treated with chemoradiotherapy (CRT).

methodsThe data for 106 CESCC patients who received radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy at the Cancer Hospital of Fujian Medical University from June 1, 2000 to December 31, 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. According to serum measurements taken before therapy, the PNI was calculated as albumin (g/L) + 5 × total lymphocyte count. The association between PNI and overall survival (OS) was determined by the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional regression model analysis.

resultsThe median follow-up time was 19 months. The optimal cutoff value for PNI was calculated to be 48.15, and patients were divided into a low PNI group (<48.15) and high PNI group (≥48.15). Univariate analysis showed that a low survival rate was significantly associated with male gender (P=0.004), tumor length ≥5.0 cm (P=0.043), radiotherapy technique (P=0.016), synchronous chemotherapy (P=0.012), lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR) (P=0.007), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (P=0.007), lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) (P=0.008), cervical esophageal carcinoma inflammation index (CEI) (P=0.043), and PNI (P<0.001). The OS was higher in the high PNI group than in the low PNI group. On multivariate analysis, gender (P=0.004), radiotherapy technique (P=0.029), and PNI (P=0.007) were independent prognostic factors in CESCC treated with CRT.

conclusionsThe PNI value is a simple, reliable, and reproducible indicator for improving the accuracy of patient prognosis. And larger-scale studies are warranted to validate these findings.

Indexed as

Cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (CESCC)chemoradiotherapy (CRT)prognosisprognostic nutritional index (PNI)

Identifiers

PMID31168456
PMCPMC6526259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.