Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31168419›Full record

ReviewBMJ global health2018

40 years after Alma-Ata, is building new hospitals in low-income and lower-middle-income countries beneficial?

Fanny Chabrol, Lucien Albert, Valéry Ridde

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ global health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fanny ChabrolCentre Population et Développement (CEPED), French Institute for Research on Sustainable Development (IRD) and Université de Paris, INSERM SAGESUD, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3256-3217
Lucien AlbertÉcole de santé publique, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Valéry RiddeCentre Population et Développement (CEPED), French Institute for Research on Sustainable Development (IRD) and Université de Paris, INSERM SAGESUD, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9299-8266

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Public hospitals in low-income and lower-middle-income countries face acute material and financial constraints, and there is a trend towards building new hospitals to contend with growing population health needs. Three cases of new hospital construction are used to explore issues in relation to their funding, maintenance and sustainability. While hospitals are recognised as a key component of healthcare systems, their role, organisation, funding and other aspects have been largely neglected in health policies and debates since the Alma Ata Declaration. Building new hospitals is politically more attractive for both national decision-makers and donors because they symbolise progress, better services and nation-building. To avoid the 'white elephant' syndrome, the deepening of within-country socioeconomic and geographical inequalities (especially urban-rural), and the exacerbation of hospital-centrism, there is an urgent need to investigate in greater depth how these hospitals are integrated into health systems and to discuss their long-term economic, social and environmental sustainability.

Indexed as

health services researchhospitalsqualitative study

Identifiers

PMID31168419
PMCPMC6518371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.