ArticleHealth information science and systems2019
Extracting features with medical sentiment lexicon and position encoding for drug reviews.
Article in Health information science and systems, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting patients' sentiments about medications using artificial intelligence techniques.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Specialists, Scientists, and Sentiments: Word2Vec and Doc2Vec in Analysis of Scientific and Medical Texts.SN computer science · 2021Article
- Guest Editorial: Special issue on "Application of artificial intelligence in health research".Health information science and systems · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Medical sentiment analysis refers to the extraction of sentiments or emotions from documents retrieved from healthcare sources, such as public forums and drug review websites. Previous studies prove that sentiment analysis for clinical documents has the potential for assisting patients with information for self assessing treatments, providing health professionals with more insights into patients' health conditions, or even managing relations between patients and doctors. Nevertheless, the lack of data used for empirical experiments in previous research indicates that there are strong needs for a systematic framework in order to identify medical field specific sentiments. We propose a new feature extraction approach utilising position embeddings to generate a medical domain enhanced sentiment lexicon with position encoding representation for drug review sentiment analysis. Experiments on different feature extraction methods using two types of sentiment lexicons with various machine learning classifiers, support the superior performance of sentiment classification with position encoding incorporated medical sentiment lexicon for drug review datasets.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.