Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31168364›Full record

ArticleHealth information science and systems2019

Extracting features with medical sentiment lexicon and position encoding for drug reviews.

Sisi Liu, Ickjai Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health information science and systems, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sisi LiuDiscipline of Computer Science & Information Technology, College of Science & Engineering, James Cook University, PO Box 6811, Cairns, QLD 4870 Australia.
Ickjai LeeDiscipline of Computer Science & Information Technology, College of Science & Engineering, James Cook University, PO Box 6811, Cairns, QLD 4870 Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6886-6201

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical sentiment analysis refers to the extraction of sentiments or emotions from documents retrieved from healthcare sources, such as public forums and drug review websites. Previous studies prove that sentiment analysis for clinical documents has the potential for assisting patients with information for self assessing treatments, providing health professionals with more insights into patients' health conditions, or even managing relations between patients and doctors. Nevertheless, the lack of data used for empirical experiments in previous research indicates that there are strong needs for a systematic framework in order to identify medical field specific sentiments. We propose a new feature extraction approach utilising position embeddings to generate a medical domain enhanced sentiment lexicon with position encoding representation for drug review sentiment analysis. Experiments on different feature extraction methods using two types of sentiment lexicons with various machine learning classifiers, support the superior performance of sentiment classification with position encoding incorporated medical sentiment lexicon for drug review datasets.

Identifiers

PMID31168364
PMCPMC6542915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.