Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31168334›Full record

ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2019

Random pulse induced synchronization and resonance in uncoupled non-identical neuron models.

Osamu Nakamura, Katsumi Tateno

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Osamu Nakamura1Department of Life Science and Systems Engineering, Kyushu Institute of Technology, Kitakyushu, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3740-1724
Katsumi Tateno2Department of Human Intelligence Systems, Kyushu Institute of Technology, 2-4 Hibikino, Wakamatsu-ku, Kitakyushu, 808-0196 Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9241-0258

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Random pulses contribute to stochastic resonance in neuron models, whereas common random pulses cause stochastic-synchronized excitation in uncoupled neuron models. We studied concurrent phenomena contributing to phase synchronization and stochastic resonance following induction by a weak common random pulse in uncoupled non-identical Hodgkin-Huxley type neuron models. The common random pulse was selected from a gamma distribution and the degree of synchronization depended on the corresponding shape parameter. Specifically, a low shape parameter of the weak random pulse induced well-synchronized spiking in uncoupled neuron models, whereas a high shape parameter of the weak random pulse or a weak periodic pulse caused low degrees of synchronization. These were improved by concurrent inputs of periodic and random pulses with high shape parameters. Finally, the output pulse was synchronized with the periodic pulse, and the common random pulse revealed periodic responses in the present neuron models.

Indexed as

Conductance-based modelNeural networksNoise-induced synchronizationSpiking neuronsStochastic resonance

Identifiers

PMID31168334
PMCPMC6520432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.