ArticleProteome science2019
Comparison of enzymatic activities and proteomic profiles of
Article in Proteome science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cellulose-functionalized magnetic nanoparticle-mediated isolation of novel cellulolytic bacteria.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2025Article
- Reciprocal regulation of rumen microbiota and epithelial genes in response to small peptide supplementation for feed efficiency in beef cattle.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- The Effects of Animal, Collection Time, and Interval on the Microbiota Structure, Metabolism, and Degradative Potential of Rumen Fluid Inoculum Collected by Esophageal Probe from Hay-Fed Cows.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Fecal Coprococcus, hidden behind abdominal symptoms in patients with small intestinal bacterial overgrowth.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Article
- Cross-talk between the gut microbiota and hypothyroidism: a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2024Article
- Microbial β-glucanases: production, properties, and engineering.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2023Review
- Fusobacterium nucleatum predicts a high risk of metastasis for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.BMC microbiology · 2021Article
- Mechanistic strategies of microbial communities regulating lignocellulose deconstruction in a UK salt marsh.Microbiome · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe rumen microbiota is one of the most complex consortia of anaerobes, involving archaea, bacteria, protozoa, fungi and phages. They are very effective at utilizing plant polysaccharides, especially cellulose and hemicelluloses. The most important hemicellulose decomposers are clustered with the genus
methodsThe study of the effect of carbon source on
resultsExtracellular β-endoxylanase as well as xylan β-xylosidase activities were induced with xylan. The presence of the xylan polymer induced hemicellulolytic enzymes and increased the protein fraction in the interval from 40 to 80 kDa. 2D electrophoresis with nLC/MS analysis of extracellular
conclusionThe comparison of four carbon sources resulted in the main significant changes in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.