Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31168232›Full record

ArticlePhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology2019

Variations in the antioxidant and free radical scavenging under induced heavy metal stress expressed as proline content in chickpea.

Sameer Suresh Bhagyawant, Dakshita Tanaji Narvekar, Neha Gupta, Amita Bhadkaria, Kirtee Kumar Koul, Nidhi Srivastava

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Plant growth promoting bacteria induce anti-quorum-sensing substances in chickpea legume seedling bioassay.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sameer Suresh Bhagyawant1School of Studies in Biotechnology, Jiwaji University, Gwalior, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4405-5930
Dakshita Tanaji Narvekar1School of Studies in Biotechnology, Jiwaji University, Gwalior, India.
Neha Gupta1School of Studies in Biotechnology, Jiwaji University, Gwalior, India.
Amita Bhadkaria1School of Studies in Biotechnology, Jiwaji University, Gwalior, India.
Kirtee Kumar Koul2School of Studies in Botany, Jiwaji University, Gwalior, India.
Nidhi Srivastava3Department of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Banasthali Vidyapith, Banasthali, India.
Jiwaji University · INBanasthali University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study pertains to the effects of heavy metal salts viz., copper (Cu), manganese (Mn), lead (Pb) and zinc (Zn) on the chickpea accession ICC-4812. The salts were given as treatments to the chickpea seeds at various ascending levels of doses till proving toxic. The treatment of 24 h soaked and swollen seeds were then extended to 7 days duration from the date of treatment. Atomic absorption spectrophotometric analysis of bioassay tissue

Indexed as

AntioxidantsChickpeaDNA damageMetal toxicityMultivariate analysis

Identifiers

PMID31168232
PMCPMC6522589
OpenAlexW2940239819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.