Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31168201›Full record

ArticleActa clinica Croatica2018

RET EXPRESSION AND ITS CORRELATION WITH CLINICOPATHOLOGIC DATA IN PAPILLARY THYROID CARCINOMA.

Ante Punda, Vladimir Bedeković, Ana Barić, Mirko Kontić, Zaviša Čolović, Lucija Vanjaka Rogošić, Hrvoje Punda, Nenad Kunac, Leo Grandić, Valdi Pešutić Pisac

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta clinica Croatica, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ante Punda1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Split University Hospital Centre, Split, Croatia; 2Department of ENT, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Department of ENT, Split University Hospital Centre, Split, Croatia; 4Dermatovenereology Private Surgery, Split, Croatia; 5Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Split University Hospital Centre, Split, Croatia; 6Department of Pathology, Forensic Medicine and Cytology, Split University Hospital Centre, Split, Croatia; 7Department of Surgery, Split University Hospital Centre, Split, Croatia.
Vladimir Bedeković1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Split University Hospital Centre, Split, Croatia; 2Department of ENT, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Department of ENT, Split University Hospital Centre, Split, Croatia; 4Dermatovenereology Private Surgery, Split, Croatia; 5Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Split University Hospital Centre, Split, Croatia; 6Department of Pathology, Forensic Medicine and Cytology, Split University Hospital Centre, Split, Croatia; 7Department of Surgery, Split University Hospital Centre, Split, Croatia.
Ana Barić1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Split University Hospital Centre, Split, Croatia; 2Department of ENT, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Department of ENT, Split University Hospital Centre, Split, Croatia; 4Dermatovenereology Private Surgery, Split, Croatia; 5Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Split University Hospital Centre, Split, Croatia; 6Department of Pathology, Forensic Medicine and Cytology, Split University Hospital Centre, Split, Croatia; 7Department of Surgery, Split University Hospital Centre, Split, Croatia.
Mirko Kontić1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Split University Hospital Centre, Split, Croatia; 2Department of ENT, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Department of ENT, Split University Hospital Centre, Split, Croatia; 4Dermatovenereology Private Surgery, Split, Croatia; 5Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Split University Hospital Centre, Split, Croatia; 6Department of Pathology, Forensic Medicine and Cytology, Split University Hospital Centre, Split, Croatia; 7Department of Surgery, Split University Hospital Centre, Split, Croatia.
Zaviša Čolović1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Split University Hospital Centre, Split, Croatia; 2Department of ENT, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Department of ENT, Split University Hospital Centre, Split, Croatia; 4Dermatovenereology Private Surgery, Split, Croatia; 5Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Split University Hospital Centre, Split, Croatia; 6Department of Pathology, Forensic Medicine and Cytology, Split University Hospital Centre, Split, Croatia; 7Department of Surgery, Split University Hospital Centre, Split, Croatia.
Lucija Vanjaka Rogošić1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Split University Hospital Centre, Split, Croatia; 2Department of ENT, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Department of ENT, Split University Hospital Centre, Split, Croatia; 4Dermatovenereology Private Surgery, Split, Croatia; 5Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Split University Hospital Centre, Split, Croatia; 6Department of Pathology, Forensic Medicine and Cytology, Split University Hospital Centre, Split, Croatia; 7Department of Surgery, Split University Hospital Centre, Split, Croatia.
Hrvoje Punda1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Split University Hospital Centre, Split, Croatia; 2Department of ENT, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Department of ENT, Split University Hospital Centre, Split, Croatia; 4Dermatovenereology Private Surgery, Split, Croatia; 5Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Split University Hospital Centre, Split, Croatia; 6Department of Pathology, Forensic Medicine and Cytology, Split University Hospital Centre, Split, Croatia; 7Department of Surgery, Split University Hospital Centre, Split, Croatia.
Nenad Kunac1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Split University Hospital Centre, Split, Croatia; 2Department of ENT, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Department of ENT, Split University Hospital Centre, Split, Croatia; 4Dermatovenereology Private Surgery, Split, Croatia; 5Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Split University Hospital Centre, Split, Croatia; 6Department of Pathology, Forensic Medicine and Cytology, Split University Hospital Centre, Split, Croatia; 7Department of Surgery, Split University Hospital Centre, Split, Croatia.
Leo Grandić1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Split University Hospital Centre, Split, Croatia; 2Department of ENT, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Department of ENT, Split University Hospital Centre, Split, Croatia; 4Dermatovenereology Private Surgery, Split, Croatia; 5Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Split University Hospital Centre, Split, Croatia; 6Department of Pathology, Forensic Medicine and Cytology, Split University Hospital Centre, Split, Croatia; 7Department of Surgery, Split University Hospital Centre, Split, Croatia.
Valdi Pešutić Pisac1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Split University Hospital Centre, Split, Croatia; 2Department of ENT, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Department of ENT, Split University Hospital Centre, Split, Croatia; 4Dermatovenereology Private Surgery, Split, Croatia; 5Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Split University Hospital Centre, Split, Croatia; 6Department of Pathology, Forensic Medicine and Cytology, Split University Hospital Centre, Split, Croatia; 7Department of Surgery, Split University Hospital Centre, Split, Croatia.
Klinički Bolnički Centar Split · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

- The purpose of this study was to analyze the possible prognostic value of RET mutation in papillary thyroid carcinoma and its incidence in the past few decades in our population, due to the increasing incidence of papillary thyroid carcinoma. The present study included 180 patients operated for papillary thyroid carcinoma. The clinical and histopathologic characteristics were analyzed. Paraffin sections of the selected histologic slides were cut again and immunohistochemically stained by the Clone 3F8 P (HIER) from Novocastra (Vision Bio Systems Europe, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK) monoclonal antibody to RET oncoprotein. Univariate analysis indicated sex (p=0.01), histologic subtype (p=0.075) and capsular invasion (p=0.010) to be statistically significant predictors of lymph node metastases, whereas age (p=0.796), tumor size (p=0.556) and intraglandular dissemination (p=0.131) showed no such correlation. The presence of RET mutation (p=0.704) was not a statistically significant predictor of the tumor metastasizing potential. RET mutation (p=0.500) showed no statistically significant correlation with papillary thyroid carcinoma classifed into prognostic groups according to clinicopathologic features either. RET mutation was detected in 30% of 180 papillary thyroid carcinomas. This is the first large study demonstrating that RET mutation incidence in papillary thyroid carcinoma in Croatian population is consistent with the classic distribution of sporadic cases, despite the increased prevalence of papillary thyroid carcinoma in the past few decades.

Indexed as

Lymphatic MetastasisMutationCarcinoma, PapillaryCroatiaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProto-Oncogene Proteins c-retThyroid NeoplasmsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-retRET protein, humanChernobyl nuclear accidentLymphatic metastasisMutationRadiationThyroid cancer, papillary

Identifiers

PMID31168201
PMCPMC6544107
OpenAlexW2971211279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.