ReviewActa clinica Croatica2018
NONOBSTRUCTIVE CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE - CLINICAL RELEVANCE, DIAGNOSIS, MANAGEMENT AND PROPOSAL OF NEW PATHOPHYSIOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION.
Review in Acta clinica Croatica, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Brazilian Coronary Disease Cohort
Cross-sectional Cohort Analysis of Plasma Proteomics in Coronary Artery Disease and Plasma Metabolomics in Coronary Artery Disease: Comparative Study Between Patients with Obstructive (≥ 50%), Non-obstructive (< 50%) and No Lesions
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association of Pericardial Fat with Severity of Coronary Artery Disease.The Indian journal of radiology & imaging · 2026Article
- Comparison of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography and Invasive Coronary Angiography in Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease: The Brazilian Coronary ARtery Disease (BARD) Study.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2026Article
- Chemokine Fractalkine and Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease-Is There a Link?International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Impact of increased serum 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine levels on extent of coronary artery lesions in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes.The Journal of international medical research · 2020Article
- SAFETY AND EFFECTS OFActa clinica Croatica · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
- New data gathered from large clinical trials indicate that nonobstructive coronary artery disease (non-CAD) is a clinical entity that should not be ignored. It is estimated that 50% of female population undergoing coronarography are diagnosed with non-CAD. There is also an increase in the prevalence of non-CAD in both genders, which is probably due to gradual expanding of clinical indications for angiography in patients with angina. Furthermore, considering the increased mortality risk established recently, a prognosis of non-CAD is not benign as previously thought. However, the concept and definition of non-CAD remains elusive causing difficulties in diagnosis and treatment. One of the major shortcomings is the exclusion-based diagnosis of non-CAD. Furthermore, treatment of non-CAD still presents a great challenge and optimal therapy is yet to be determined. There are two major hypotheses explaining the pathophysiological mechanisms of non-CAD, i.e. ischemic hypothesis based on abnormal microvascular dysfunction and non-ischemic one based on altered pain perception. This review encompasses a broader spectrum of pathophysiological mechanisms of non-CAD, and proposes a new way of classification based on the major disorder involved: type I (ischemic mechanisms) and type II (non-ischemic mechanisms), depending on which mechanism predominates. Hopefully, this would provide new insights in the understanding of this disorder, thus leading to accurate and early diagnosis and successful treatment, especially considering the increased mortality risk in these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.