Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31168123›Full record

ArticleJournal of food science and technology2019

Mucilage powder from cactus pears as functional ingredient: influence of cultivar and harvest month on the physicochemical and technological properties.

Alba Du Toit, Maryna De Wit, Hermanus J Fouché, Marli Taljaard, Sonja L Venter, Arno Hugo

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of food science and technology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Cactus Pear Mucilage (Polymers · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Food technology and biotechnology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alba Du Toit1Department of Consumer Science, Internal P.O. Box 71, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of the Free State, P.O Box 339, Bloemfontein, 9300 South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-7444-7858
Maryna De Wit2Department of Microbial, Biochemical and Food Biotechnology, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
Hermanus J Fouché3Agricultural Research Council - Animal Production, P/a University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
Marli Taljaard1Department of Consumer Science, Internal P.O. Box 71, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of the Free State, P.O Box 339, Bloemfontein, 9300 South Africa.
Sonja L Venter4Agricultural Research Council - Vegetable and Ornamental Plants, Private Bag X293, Pretoria, South Africa.
Arno Hugo2Department of Microbial, Biochemical and Food Biotechnology, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cactus pear mucilage is a novel, inexpensive hydrocolloid that is used to add nutrients, body and texture to functional food products. However, varied physicochemical and technological properties of powders when cultivar and harvest month of cladodes differ could lead to differentiation in the application of mucilage powders. To that end, three

Indexed as

Carbohydrate polymerCladodeEmulsifying agentNopalOpuntia ficus-indicaOpuntia robusta

Identifiers

PMID31168123
PMCPMC6525674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.