Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31168095›Full record

ArticleNature2019

Mating preferences of selfish sex chromosomes.

Pavitra Muralidhar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Chromosome-specific drift under stabilizing selection generates polygenic barriers to sex chromosome turnover.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Polygenic response of sex chromosomes to sexual antagonism.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2024
    Article
  5. Assortative mating enhances postzygotic barriers to gene flow via ancestry bundling.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. A gene's-eye view of sexual antagonism.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pavitra MuralidharDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA. pmuralidhar@g.harvard.edu.
Harvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evolution of female mating preferences for harmful male traits is a central paradox of sexual selection

Indexed as

Mating Preference, AnimalModels, BiologicalAllelesAnimalsEvolution, MolecularFemaleMaleModels, GeneticRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidSex Chromosomes

Identifiers

PMID31168095
OpenAlexW2948276351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.