ArticlePediatrics2019
A Prediction Model to Identify Febrile Infants ≤60 Days at Low Risk of Invasive Bacterial Infection.
Article in Pediatrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediction Rule to Identify Febrile Infants 61-90 Days at Low Risk for Invasive Bacterial Infections.Pediatrics · 2025Article
- Risk of Bacterial Infections in Febrile Infants 61 to 90 Days Old With Respiratory Viruses.Pediatrics · 2025Article
- Risk Factors for Serious Bacterial Infections Among Young Infants With Hypothermia: Protocol for a Multicenter, Retrospective Case-Control Study.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Scoping review of clinical decision aids in the assessment and management of febrile infants under 90 days of age.BMC pediatrics · 2025Article
- Variability in Invasive Bacterial Infection Proportions Among Febrile Infants Aged 8-90 Days Using Administrative Data.Academic pediatrics · 2025Article
- Diagnostic Performance of AAP-Recommended Inflammatory Markers in Febrile Infants Aged 60 Days or Younger.Pediatrics · 2025Article
- Performance of clinical decision aids (CDA) for the care of young febrile infants: a multicentre prospective cohort study conducted in the UK and Ireland.EClinicalMedicine · 2024Article
- The Critical Lens: It is time to start using the right test for febrile young infants.Paediatrics & child health · 2024Article
- La prise en charge des nourrissons de 90 jours ou moins, fiévreux mais dans un bon état général.Paediatrics & child health · 2024Review
- Management of well-appearing febrile young infants aged ≤90 days.Paediatrics & child health · 2024Review
- Prevalence of Urinary Tract Infection, Bacteremia, and Meningitis Among Febrile Infants Aged 8 to 60 Days With SARS-CoV-2.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Performance Evaluation of Host Biomarker Combinations for the Diagnosis of Serious Bacterial Infection in Young Febrile Children: A Double-Blind, Multicentre, Observational Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Derivation of a clinical-based model to detect invasive bacterial infections in febrile infants.Journal of hospital medicine · 2022Article
- Disparities and implicit bias in the management of low-risk febrile infants: a mixed methods study protocol.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Clinical management and outcomes for febrile infants 29-60 days evaluated in community emergency departments.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2022Article
- Pyrexia in a young infant - is height of fever associated with serious bacterial infection?BMC pediatrics · 2022Article
- Refinement and Validation of a Clinical-Based Approach to Evaluate Young Febrile Infants.Hospital pediatrics · 2022Article
- Risk-stratification in febrile infants 29 to 60 days old: a cost-effectiveness analysis.BMC pediatrics · 2022Article
- IBI Score to Improve Clinical Practice in Newborns and Infants ≤ 60 Days with Fever in the Emergency Department.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2022Article
- Epidemiology of findings of lumbar puncture among pediatric patients.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo derive and internally validate a prediction model for the identification of febrile infants ≤60 days old at low probability of invasive bacterial infection (IBI).
methodsWe conducted a case-control study of febrile infants ≤60 days old who presented to the emergency departments of 11 hospitals between July 1, 2011 and June 30, 2016. Infants with IBI, defined by growth of a pathogen in blood (bacteremia) and/or cerebrospinal fluid (bacterial meningitis), were matched by hospital and date of visit to 2 control patients without IBI. Ill-appearing infants and those with complex chronic conditions were excluded. Predictors of IBI were identified with multiple logistic regression and internally validated with 10-fold cross-validation, and an IBI score was calculated.
resultsWe included 181 infants with IBI (155 [85.6%] with bacteremia without meningitis and 26 [14.4%] with bacterial meningitis) and 362 control patients. Twenty-three infants with IBI (12.7%) and 138 control patients (38.1%) had fever by history only. Four predictors of IBI were identified (area under the curve 0.83 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.79-0.86]) and incorporated into an IBI score: age <21 days (1 point), highest temperature recorded in the emergency department 38.0-38.4°C (2 points) or ≥38.5°C (4 points), absolute neutrophil count ≥5185 cells per μL (2 points), and abnormal urinalysis results (3 points). The sensitivity and specificity of a score ≥2 were 98.8% (95% CI: 95.7%-99.9%) and 31.3% (95% CI: 26.3%-36.6%), respectively. All 26 infants with meningitis had scores ≥2.
conclusionsInfants ≤60 days old with fever by history only, a normal urinalysis result, and an absolute neutrophil count <5185 cells per μL have a low probability of IBI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.