Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31167871›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Trends in the incidence of testing for vitamin D deficiency in primary care in the UK: a retrospective analysis of The Health Improvement Network (THIN), 2005-2015.

Francesca L Crowe, Kate Jolly, Christine MacArthur, Semira Manaseki-Holland, Neil Gittoes, Martin Hewison, Robert Scragg, Krishnarajah Nirantharakumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Knowledge about Vitamin D among General Population in Baghdad City.Rwanda journal of medicine and health sciences · 2024
    Article
  17. Non-indicated vitamin BBMJ open · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Reduce unnecessary routine vitamin D testing.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Francesca L CroweInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4026-1726
Kate JollyInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Christine MacArthurInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Semira Manaseki-HollandInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Neil GittoesCentre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Martin HewisonInstitute of Metabolism and Systems, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Robert ScraggSchool of Population Health, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Krishnarajah NirantharakumarInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate trends in the incidence of testing for vitamin D deficiency and the prevalence of patients with circulating concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) indicative of deficiency (<30 nmol/L) between 2005 and 2015.

designLongitudinal analysis of electronic health records in The Health Improvement Network primary care database.

settingUK primary care.

interventionNone.

participantsThe analysis included 6 416 709 participants aged 18 years and older. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: Incidence of having a blood test for vitamin D deficiency between 2005 and 2015, the prevalence with blood 25(OH)D <30 nmol/L and the effects of age, ethnicity and socioeconomic status on these measures were assessed.

resultsAfter a mean follow-up time of 5.4 (SD 3.7) years, there were 210 502 patients tested for vitamin D deficiency. The incidence of vitamin D testing rose from 0.29 per 1000 person-years at risk (PYAR) (95% CI 0.27 to 0.31) in 2005 to 16.1 per 1000 PYAR (95% CI 15.9 to 16.2) in 2015. Being female, older, non-white ethnicity and more economically deprived were all strongly associated with being tested. One-third (n=69 515) had 25(OH)D <30 nmol/L, but the per cent deficient among ethnic minority groups ranged from 43% among mixed ethnicity to 66% in Asians. Being male, younger and more economically deprived were also all associated with vitamin D deficiency (p<0.001).

conclusionsTesting for vitamin D deficiency increased over the past decade among adults in the UK. One-third of UK adults who had a vitamin D test performed in primary care were vitamin D deficient, and deficiency was much higher among ethnic minority patients. Future research should focus on strategies to ensure population intake of vitamin D, particularly in at-risk groups, meets recommendations to reduce the risk of deficiency and need for testing.

Indexed as

AdultAgedEthnicityFemaleHumansIncidenceLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPrevalencePrimary Health CareRetrospective StudiesSocial ClassUnited KingdomVitamin D Deficiency25-hydroxyvitamin Ddeficiencyprimary carethe health improvement networkvitamin D

Identifiers

PMID31167871
PMCPMC6561453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.