Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31167866›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

The utility of health belief model to explain self-protective behaviour against pneumoconiosis in Chinese underground coal miners: a cross-sectional study.

Qiong Liu, Wanli Chen, Renjie Qi, Yang Geng, Ya Liu, Ying Zhou, Chenggang Zhang, Xian Wang, Jiwei Wang, Jinming Yu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Qiong Liu *Key Laboratory of Health Technology Assessment of Ministry of health, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Wanli Chen *Key Laboratory of Health Technology Assessment of Ministry of health, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Renjie QiKey Laboratory of Health Technology Assessment of Ministry of health, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yang GengKey Laboratory of Health Technology Assessment of Ministry of health, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Ya LiuKey Laboratory of Health Technology Assessment of Ministry of health, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Ying ZhouKey Laboratory of Health Technology Assessment of Ministry of health, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Chenggang ZhangShanghai Xuhui Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai, China.
Xian WangShanghai Xuhui Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai, China.
Jiwei WangKey Laboratory of Health Technology Assessment of Ministry of health, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jinming YuKey Laboratory of Health Technology Assessment of Ministry of health, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Fudan University · CNShanghai Municipal Center For Disease Control Prevention · CNShanghai Medical College of Fudan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCoal workers' pneumoconiosis is caused by exposure to respirable coal mine dust. The self-protection of underground coal miners (UCM) plays an irreplaceable role against this threat. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the predictors of self-protective behaviour (SPB) in Chinese UCM based on the health belief model (HBM).

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among 341 UCM in January 2016 in Pingdingshan City, Henan Province, People's Republic of China. Data was collected using a self-reported questionnaire, which included questions on sociodemographic characteristics, HBM variables and SPB. An exploratory factor analysis of the principal components with varimax rotation was carried out on the HBM-related items. Pearson's correlation and multiple linear regression analysis were used to assess the relationship between sociodemographic characteristics, HBM variables and SPB.

resultsMultiple regression analysis demonstrated the monthly income (B=0.403, p=0.001), the internal cues to action (B=0.380, p<0.001) and external cues to action (B=0.401, p<0.001) as the predictors of UCM's SPB, accounting for 24.8% of total variance (F=34.96, p<0.001), while the cognition variables of HBM were not significantly associated with SPB.

conclusionThe results suggested that both internal and external cues to action were powerful predictors for SPB. These findings highlight that further efforts are required to provide the UCM with periodic health check-up reports and promote the active role of doctors and family members in miners' decision-making to simulate them for better SPB. ETHICS APPROVAL: All data collection procedures received ethical approval from the Ethics Committee of Xuhui District Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (XHHEC-2016-7).

Indexed as

Coal MiningAdultChinaCross-Sectional StudiesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedMinersOccupational DiseasesOccupational ExposurePneumoconiosisProtective ClothingSelf CareSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adulthealth belief modelself-protective behaviorunderground coal miners

Identifiers

PMID31167866
PMCPMC6561464
OpenAlexW2958356084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.