Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31167850›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

Figure-Ground Organization in Natural Scenes: Performance of a Recurrent Neural Model Compared with Neurons of Area V2.

Brian Hu, Rüdiger von der Heydt, Ernst Niebur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Brain-like border ownership signals support prediction of natural videos.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  5. Grouping cells in primate visual cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Searching for object pointers in the visual cortex.Journal of neurophysiology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Brian HuZanvyl Krieger Mind/Brain Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218 brianh@alleninstitute.org.ORCID 0000-0002-5866-8762
Rüdiger von der HeydtZanvyl Krieger Mind/Brain Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218.ORCID 0000-0002-8741-813X
Ernst NieburZanvyl Krieger Mind/Brain Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218.ORCID 0000-0002-2815-9262

Funding

CRCNS: Neural decision mechanisms: from value-encoding to preference reversalR01DA040990 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI NIEBUR, ERNST, STUPHORN, VEIT · 2015 to 2018
$1.1M
CRCNS:Proto-object based perceptual organization in three dimensionsR01EY027544 · NEI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ETIENNE-CUMMINGS, RALPH, NIEBUR, ERNST · 2016 to 2018
$1.1M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027544NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA040990
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A crucial step in understanding visual input is its organization into meaningful components, in particular object contours and partially occluded background structures. This requires that all contours are assigned to either the foreground or the background (border ownership assignment). While earlier studies showed that neurons in primate extrastriate cortex signal border ownership for simple geometric shapes, recent studies show consistent border ownership coding also for complex natural scenes. In order to understand how the brain performs this task, we developed a biologically plausible recurrent neural network that is fully image computable. Our model uses local edge detector ( B ) cells and grouping ( G ) cells whose activity represents proto-objects based on the integration of local feature information. G cells send modulatory feedback connections to those B cells that caused their activation, making the B cells border ownership selective. We found close agreement between our model and neurophysiological results in terms of the timing of border ownership signals (BOSs) as well as the consistency of BOSs across scenes. We also benchmarked our model on the Berkeley Segmentation Dataset and achieved performance comparable to recent state-of-the-art computer vision approaches. Our proposed model provides insight into the cortical mechanisms of figure-ground organization.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerForm PerceptionHumansModels, NeurologicalNeuronsPattern Recognition, VisualPhotic StimulationVisual Cortexborder ownershipnatural scenesneural networksperceptual organizationrecurrent processing

Identifiers

PMID31167850
PMCPMC6635809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.