Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31167761›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the rheumatic diseases2019

Development and validation of a methotrexate adherence assay.

James Bluett, Isabel Riba-Garcia, Suzanne M M Verstappen, Thierry Wendling, Kayode Ogungbenro, Richard D Unwin, Anne Barton

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Could a methotrexate blood assay improve adherence?Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

James BluettVersus Arthritis Centre for Genetics and Genomics, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK james.bluett@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-5062-5779
Isabel Riba-GarciaCentre for Advanced Discovery and Experimental Therapeutics (CADET), Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Suzanne M M VerstappenNIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
Thierry WendlingCentre for Applied Pharmacokinetic Research, Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
Kayode OgungbenroCentre for Applied Pharmacokinetic Research, Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
Richard D UnwinCentre for Advanced Discovery and Experimental Therapeutics (CADET), Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Anne BartonVersus Arthritis Centre for Genetics and Genomics, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G1000417Medical Research Council MR/N00583X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe first-line therapy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is weekly oral methotrexate (MTX) at low dosages (7.5-25 mg/week). However, ~40% of patients are non-adherent which may explain why some do not respond and need to start more expensive biological therapies. To monitor adherence more accurately and develop strategies to improve it, a validated objective MTX adherence test is required.

objectiveTo develop and validate the diagnostic accuracy of a novel MTX adherence assay using high-performance liquid chromatography-selected reaction monitoring- mass spectrometry (HPLC-SRM-MS) based biochemical analysis of drug levels.

methods20 patients with RA underwent MTX pharmacokinetic assessment using HPLC-SRM-MS MTX plasma concentration analysis over a 6-day period. Directly observed therapy was the reference standard. Pharmacokinetic model validation was performed using independent plasma samples from real-world patients (n=50) with self-reported times of drug administration. Following assay optimisation, the sensitivity of the assay to detect adherence was established using samples from an observational cohort study (n=138).

resultsA two-compartment pharmacokinetic model was developed and validated. Simulations described the sensitivity required for MTX detection over 7 days; subsequent assay optimisation and retesting of samples confirmed that all patients were correctly identified as MTX adherers. Using real-world samples, the assays sensitivity was 95%.

conclusionNon-adherence to MTX is common and can have a significant effect on disease activity. HPLC-SRM-MS plasma analysis accurately detects MTX adherence. The validated objective test could easily be used in clinic to identify patients requiring adherence support.

Indexed as

Medication AdherenceAgedAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidChromatography, High Pressure LiquidDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansMaleMass SpectrometryMethotrexateMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsAntirheumatic AgentsMethotrexateadherenceassaymethotrexatepharmacokineticrheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID31167761
PMCPMC6788879
OpenAlexW2951248229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.