Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31167758›Full record

GuidelineAnnals of the rheumatic diseases2020

2018 updated European League Against Rheumatism evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis of gout.

Pascal Richette, Michael Doherty, Eliseo Pascual, Victoria Barskova, Fabio Becce, Johann Castaneda, Malcolm Coyfish, Sylvie Guillo, Tim Jansen, Hein Janssens and 14 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readConsensus StatementPractice Guideline
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Guideline in Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 179 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
179citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
28.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

179 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 413 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. [Gout of the manubriosternal joints: A case report].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

119 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 16 institutions in 11 countries.

Pascal RichetteService de Rhumatologie, Hopital Lariboisiere Centre Viggo Petersen, Paris, France pascal.richette@aphp.fr.ORCID 0000-0003-2132-4074
Michael DohertyAcademic Rheumatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Eliseo PascualRheumatology, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
Victoria BarskovaInstitute of Rheumatology, RAMS, Moscow, Russian.
Fabio BecceRadiology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8444-8504
Johann CastanedaAP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Département Biostatistique Santé Publique et Information Médicale, Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie (Cephepi), INSERM, UMR 1123 ECEVE, CIC-1421, Paris, France, Paris, France.
Malcolm CoyfishNottingham, UK.
Sylvie GuilloDépartement d'Epidémiologie et Recherche Clinique, Paris, France.
Tim JansenRheumatology, VieCuri, Venlo, Netherlands.
Hein JanssensDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Frédéric LiotéDepartment of Rhumatologie, Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris, France.
Christian D MallenArthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Keele University, Keele, UK.
George NukiCentre Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
Fernando Perez-RuizServicio de Reumatologia, Hospital de Cruces, Baracaldo, Spain.
José PimentaoRheumatology Unit, Clínica Coração de Jesus, Lisbon, Portugal.
Leonardo PunziDepartment of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Anthony PywellNottingham, UK.
Alexander K SoMusculoskeletal Medicine, Service de RMR, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Anne-Kathrin TauscheDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Rheumatology, University Clinic Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Saxonia, Germany.
Till UhligRheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Jakub ZavadaInstitute of Rheumatology, Prague, Czech Republic, Czech Republic.
Weiya ZhangAcademic Rheumatology, Nottingham University, Nottingham, UK.
Florence TubachBiostatistics and epidemiology, APHP, Hopital Pitié Salpetrière, Paris, France.
Thomas BardinRheumatology, Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5080-4790
University of Nottingham · GBInserm · FRInstitute of Rheumatology · CZArthritis UK · GBAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRCenter for Rheumatology · USDiakonhjemmet Hospital · NOHospital General Universitario de Alicante Doctor Balmis · ESInstituto do Coração · PTRadboud University Nijmegen · NLSociedad Española de Reumatología · ESSorbonne Université · FRUniversity of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Lausanne · CHUniversity of Padua · ITVieCuri Medisch Centrum · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although gout is the most common inflammatory arthritis, it is still frequently misdiagnosed. New data on imaging and clinical diagnosis have become available since the first EULAR recommendations for the diagnosis of gout in 2006. This prompted a systematic review and update of the 2006 recommendations. A systematic review of the literature concerning all aspects of gout diagnosis was performed. Recommendations were formulated using a Delphi consensus approach. Eight key recommendations were generated. A search for crystals in synovial fluid or tophus aspirates is recommended in every person with suspected gout, because demonstration of monosodium urate (MSU) crystals allows a definite diagnosis of gout. There was consensus that a number of suggestive clinical features support a clinical diagnosis of gout. These are monoarticular involvement of a foot or ankle joint (especially the first metatarsophalangeal joint); previous episodes of similar acute arthritis; rapid onset of severe pain and swelling; erythema; male gender and associated cardiovascular diseases and hyperuricaemia. When crystal identification is not possible, it is recommended that any atypical presentation should be investigated by imaging, in particular with ultrasound to seek features suggestive of MSU crystal deposition (double contour sign and tophi). There was consensus that a diagnosis of gout should not be based on the presence of hyperuricaemia alone. There was also a strong recommendation that all people with gout should be systematically assessed for presence of associated comorbidities and risk factors for cardiovascular disease, as well as for risk factors for chronic hyperuricaemia. Eight updated, evidence-based, expert consensus recommendations for the diagnosis of gout are proposed.

Indexed as

GoutHumansHyperuricemiaRadiographyRisk FactorsSynovial FluidTomography, X-Ray ComputedUltrasonographyUric AcidUric Acidepidemiologygouthealth services research

Identifiers

PMID31167758
OpenAlexW2950920031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.