Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31167665›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2019

Novel algorithms for LDD motif search.

Peng Xiao, Martin Schiller, Sanguthevar Rajasekaran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Peng XiaoDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Connecticut, 371 Fairfield Road, Storrs, 06269, CT, USA.
Martin SchillerSchool of Life Sciences, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
Sanguthevar RajasekaranDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Connecticut, 371 Fairfield Road, Storrs, 06269, CT, USA. rajasek@engr.uconn.edu.

Funding

The Genome Analysis and Sequencing Pipeline (GASP)P20GM121325 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS · PI CHEN, JINGCHUN · 2018 to 2022
$11.5M
The C-terminomeR15GM107983 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS · PI SCHILLER, MARTIN R · 2013 to 2013
$443k
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM121325NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM107983
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMotifs are crucial patterns that have numerous applications including the identification of transcription factors and their binding sites, composite regulatory patterns, similarity between families of proteins, etc. Several motif models have been proposed in the literature. The (l,d)-motif model is one of these that has been studied widely. However, this model will sometimes report too many spurious motifs than expected. We interpret a motif as a biologically significant entity that is evolutionarily preserved within some distance. It may be highly improbable that the motif undergoes the same number of changes in each of the species. To address this issue, in this paper, we introduce a new model which is more general than (l,d)-motif model. This model is called (l,d

resultsWe did both theoretical analyses and empirical tests on these algorithms. Theoretical analyses demonstrate that our algorithms have less computational cost than the pattern driven approach. Empirical results on both simulated datasets and real datasets show that each of the three algorithms has some advantages on some (l,d

conclusionsWe proposed LDDMS model which is more practically relevant. We also proposed three exact efficient algorithms to solve the problem. Besides, our algorithms can be nicely parallelized. We believe that the idea in this new model can also be extended to other motif search problems such as Edit-distance-based Motif Search (EMS) and Simple Motif Search (SMS).

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAmino Acid MotifsNucleotide MotifsComputational BiologyHumansModels, TheoreticalSequence Analysis, DNASequence Analysis, ProteinMotif searchNeighborhood treeRadix sort

Identifiers

PMID31167665
PMCPMC6551235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.