Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31167661›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2019

A computational method to aid the design and analysis of single cell RNA-seq experiments for cell type identification.

Douglas Abrams, Parveen Kumar, R Krishna Murthy Karuturi, Joshy George

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. IL-23 Promotes γδT Cell Activity in Dry Eye Disease Progression.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. An insight into planarian regeneration.Cell proliferation · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Douglas AbramsColby College, Waterville, ME, USA.
Parveen KumarThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT, 06032, USA.
R Krishna Murthy KaruturiThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT, 06032, USA. krishna.karuturi@jax.org.
Joshy GeorgeThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT, 06032, USA. joshy.george@jax.org.

Funding

Shared Resource ManagementP30CA034196 · NCI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI William Carl Skarnes · 1985 to 2026
$61.9M
Summer Research Experience in Cancer Biology and Genomics for UndergraduatesR25CA174584 · NCI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI SHULTZ, LEONARD · 2013 to 2017
$243k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA034196NCI NIH HHS R25 CA174584
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe advent of single cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) enabled researchers to study transcriptomic activity within individual cells and identify inherent cell types in the sample. Although numerous computational tools have been developed to analyze single cell transcriptomes, there are no published studies and analytical packages available to guide experimental design and to devise suitable analysis procedure for cell type identification.

resultsWe have developed an empirical methodology to address this important gap in single cell experimental design and analysis into an easy-to-use tool called SCEED (Single Cell Empirical Experimental Design and analysis). With SCEED, user can choose a variety of combinations of tools for analysis, conduct performance analysis of analytical procedures and choose the best procedure, and estimate sample size (number of cells to be profiled) required for a given analytical procedure at varying levels of cell type rarity and other experimental parameters. Using SCEED, we examined 3 single cell algorithms using 48 simulated single cell datasets that were generated for varying number of cell types and their proportions, number of genes expressed per cell, number of marker genes and their fold change, and number of single cells successfully profiled in the experiment.

conclusionsBased on our study, we found that when marker genes are expressed at fold change of 4 or more, either Seurat or SIMLR algorithm can be used to analyze single cell dataset for any number of single cells isolated (minimum 1000 single cells were tested). However, when marker genes are expected to be only up to fold change of 2, choice of the single cell algorithm is dependent on the number of single cells isolated and rarity of cell types to be identified. In conclusion, our work allows the assessment of various single cell methods and also aids in the design of single cell experiments.

Indexed as

Research DesignAlgorithmsComputational BiologyComputer SimulationDatabases, GeneticGene Expression ProfilingHumansSample SizeSequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell AnalysisAnalysis designCell-type identificationClusteringExperimental designSingle cell RNA-seq

Identifiers

PMID31167661
PMCPMC6551246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.