ReviewMilitary Medical Research2019
Contemporary approaches to visual prostheses.
Review in Military Medical Research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- Motion perception with visual prostheses.Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England) · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Ocular Drug Delivery: Precision Drug Delivery's New Horizon.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2025Review
- Can bionic eyes restore vision? Breakthroughs, challenges, and future frontiers in ophthalmology - A comprehensive review.Journal of biological engineering · 2025Article
- Review
- Article
- A Phosphenotron Device for Sensoric Spatial Resolution of Phosphenes within the Visual Field Using Non-Invasive Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- The Influence of Phosphene Synchrony in Driving Object Binding in a Simulation of Artificial Vision.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2023Article
- An update on visual prosthesis.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2023Review
- Application of Electrophysiology in Non-Macular Inherited Retinal Dystrophies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Attitudes of potential recipients toward emerging visual prosthesis technologies.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Retinal Prostheses: Engineering and Clinical Perspectives for Vision Restoration.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- New frontiers of retinal therapeutic intervention: a critical analysis of novel approaches.Annals of medicine · 2022Review
- A narrative review of cortical visual prosthesis systems: the latest progress and significance of nanotechnology for the future.Annals of translational medicine · 2022Review
- A Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: Long-Term Observation of the Electrode-Tissue Interface.Translational vision science & technology · 2022Article
- Optic chiasmatic potential by endoscopically implanted skull base microinvasive biosensor: a brain-machine interface approach for anterior visual pathway assessment.Theranostics · 2022Article
- Full gaze contingency provides better reading performance than head steering alone in a simulation of prosthetic vision.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- The impact of synchronous versus asynchronous electrical stimulation in artificial vision.Journal of neural engineering · 2021Review
- Monitoring Visual Cortical Activities During Progressive Retinal Degeneration Using Functional Bioluminescence Imaging.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- Oculomotor Responses to Dynamic Stimuli in a 44-Channel Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis.Translational vision science & technology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Visual prostheses serve to restore visual function following acquired blindness. Acquired blindness (as opposed to congenital blindness) has many causes, including diseases such as retinitis pigmentosa, glaucoma, and macular degeneration, or trauma such as caused by automobile accident or blast damage from explosions. Many of the blindness-causing diseases target the retina or other ocular structure. Often, despite the loss of sensitivity to light, the remainder of the visual pathway is still functional, enabling electrical devices to deliver effective and meaningful visual information to the brain via arrays of electrodes. These arrays can be placed in any part of the early visual pathway, such as the retina, optic nerve, lateral geniculate nucleus, or visual cortex. A camera or other imaging source is used to drive electrical stimulation of remaining healthy cells or structures to create artificial vision and provide restoration of function. In this review, each approach to visual prostheses is described, including advantages and disadvantages as well as assessments of the current state of the art. Most of the work to-date has been targeting stimulation of (a) the retina, with three devices approved for general use and two more in clinical testing; (b) the lateral geniculate nucleus, with efforts still in the pre-clinical stage; and (c) the cortex, with three devices in clinical testing and none currently approved for general use despite the longest history of investigation of the three major approaches. Each class of device has different medical indications, and different levels of invasiveness required for implantation. All contemporary devices deliver relatively poor vision. There has been remarkable progress since the first proof-of-concept demonstration that used stimulation of the primary visual cortex, with the field exploring all viable options for restoration of function. Much of the progress has been recent, driven by advances in microelectronics and biocompatibility. With three devices currently approved for general use in various parts of the world, and a handful of additional devices well along in the pipeline toward approval, prospects for wide deployment of a device-based therapy to treat acquired blindness are good.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.