Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31167649›Full record

ArticleBMC pediatrics2019

Head ultrasound, CT or MRI? The choice of neuroimaging in the assessment of infants with congenital cytomegalovirus infection.

Mina Smiljkovic, Christian Renaud, Bruce Tapiero, Valérie Lamarre, Fatima Kakkar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pediatrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mina SmiljkovicDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Infectious Diseases, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Christian RenaudDepartment of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, CHU Sainte-Justine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Bruce TapieroDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Infectious Diseases, CHU Sainte-Justine, Université de Montréal, 3175 Côte Sainte-Catherine, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Valérie LamarreDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Infectious Diseases, CHU Sainte-Justine, Université de Montréal, 3175 Côte Sainte-Catherine, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Fatima KakkarDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Infectious Diseases, CHU Sainte-Justine, Université de Montréal, 3175 Côte Sainte-Catherine, Montreal, QC, Canada. fatima.kakkar@umontreal.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-7408-4399

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite growing interest in universal screening for congenital CMV infection (cCMV), and data to support treatment for cases with central nervous system (CNS) involvement, there is limited regarding the optimal imaging modalities to identify CNS involvement. The objective of this study was to assess the concordance between head ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT), in identifying neurological abnormalities in infants with cCMV infection, and to determine whether the addition of advanced neuroimaging after US had an impact on clinical management.

methodsRetrospective review of infants with cCMV infection, referred to the Centre d'Infectiologie Mère-Enfant (CIME) at Sainte-Justine Hospital Center in Montreal, between 2008 and 2016. Only patients who underwent head US followed by and brain MRI or CT scan were included in this analysis.

resultsOf 46 cases of cCMV identified during the study period, 34 (74%) had a head US followed by MRI (n = 28, 61%), or CT scan (n = 6, 13%). In the majority of cases (n = 24, 71%), both images were concordant (11 both reported abnormal, 13 both reported normal). In 5 cases, US was reported normal and subsequent imaging (MRI = 4, CT = 1); reported abnormal. In all 5 cases patients were clinically symptomatic and met treatment criteria even in the absence of neuroimaging findings. In 5 cases, US was reported abnormal with a subsequent normal MRI (4) or CT (1); in 2 of these cases, patients were clinically symptomatic and met treatment criteria regardless of neuroimaging findings. However, in 3 cases, the patients were clinically asymptomatic, and in 2 of these cases, treated based only on the abnormal US findings.

conclusionsIn this study, we found that that sequential US and MRI were concordant in the majority (71%) of cases in detecting abnormalities potentially associated with cCMV infection. While the addition of MRI to baseline head ultrasound did not influence the decision to treat in clinically symptomatic infants, the addition of MRI to infants with abnormal HUS imaging who are clinically asymptomatic could help refine treatment decisions in these cases.

Indexed as

Age FactorsBrainCentral Nervous System Viral DiseasesContrast MediaCytomegalovirus InfectionsGadoliniumHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMagnetic Resonance ImagingMultidetector Computed TomographyNeuroimagingRetrospective StudiesUltrasonographyContrast MediaGadoliniumCongenitalCytomegalovirusImagingInfectionPediatrics

Identifiers

PMID31167649
PMCPMC6549373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.