Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31167429›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2019

Sex and Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: From Pathophysiology to Clinical Studies.

Marijana Tadic, Cesare Cuspidi, Sven Plein, Evgeny Belyavskiy, Frank Heinzel, Maurizio Galderisi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Epigenetic regulation of sex dimorphism in cardiovascular health.Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Marijana TadicDepartment of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburgerplatz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany. marijana_tadic@hotmail.com.
Cesare CuspidiClinical Research Unit, University of Milan-Bicocca and Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Viale della Resistenza 23, 20036 Meda, Italy. cesare.cuspidi@unimib.com.
Sven PleinDepartment of Biomedical Imaging Science, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK. s.plein@leeds.ac.uk.
Evgeny BelyavskiyDepartment of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburgerplatz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany. Evgeny.Belyavskiy@charite.de.
Frank HeinzelDepartment of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburgerplatz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany. Frank.heinzel@charite.de.
Maurizio GalderisiDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Federico II University Hospital, Edificio 1 Via Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy. Maurizio.gaderi@unina.com.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEFederico II University Hospital · ITUniversity of Leeds · GBUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

British Heart Foundation RG/16/1/32092
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) represents the most frequent form of heart failure in women, with almost two-fold higher prevalence than in men. Studies have revealed sex-specific HFpEF pathophysiology, and suggested the possibility of a sex-specific therapeutic approach in these patients. Some cardiovascular risk factors, such as arterial hypertension, obesity, diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, and race, show specific features that might be responsible for the development of HFpEF in women. These risk factors are related to specific cardiovascular changes-left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and hypertrophy, ventricular-vascular coupling, and impaired functional capacity-that are related to specific cardiac phenotype and HFpEF development. However, there is no agreement regarding outcomes in women with HFpEF. For HFpEF, most studies have found higher hospitalization rates for women than for men. Mortality rates are usually not different. Pharmacological treatment in HFpEF is challenging, along with many unresolved issues and questions raised. Available data on medical therapy in patients with HFpEF show no difference in outcomes between the sexes. Further investigations are necessary to better understand the pathophysiology and mechanisms of HFpEF, as well as to improve and eventually develop sex-specific therapy for HFpEF.

Indexed as

epidemiologyHFpEFrisk factorssextreatment

Identifiers

PMID31167429
PMCPMC6617502
OpenAlexW2948942966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.