Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31167023›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2019

Association of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Treatment With Subgenual Cingulate Hyperactivity in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Itay Hadas, Yinming Sun, Pantelis Lioumis, Reza Zomorrodi, Brett Jones, Daphne Voineskos, Jonathan Downar, Paul B Fitzgerald, Daniel M Blumberger, Zafiris J Daskalakis

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01515215 (Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 43 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01515215 nacompletednot on this map

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) for Treatment Resistant Depressive Disorder

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthRan2008 to 2016Enrolled107ConditionsMajor Depressive DisorderArmsRepetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Clinical utility and prospective of TMS-EEG: Updated review from an international expert group.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Circuit-Based Approaches to Understanding the Anterior Cingulate Cortex (ACC).The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Rapid-Acting Treatments for Perinatal Depression: Clinical Landscapes and Future Horizons.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Review
  19. Identifying neural circuitry abnormalities in neuropathic pain with transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalogram co-registration.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Article
  20. What can neuroimaging of neuromodulation reveal about the basis of circuit therapies for psychiatry?Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Itay HadasTemerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Yinming SunDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Pantelis LioumisTemerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Reza ZomorrodiTemerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Brett JonesTemerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Daphne VoineskosTemerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jonathan DownarMRI-Guided rTMS Clinic, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Paul B FitzgeraldEpworth Centre for Innovation in Mental Health, Epworth HealthCare, Camberwell, Victoria, Australia.
Daniel M BlumbergerTemerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Zafiris J DaskalakisTemerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
University of Toronto · CACentre for Addiction and Mental Health · CAMonash Alfred Psychiatry Research centre · AUStanford University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Hyperactivity in the subgenual cingulate cortex (SGC) is associated with major depressive disorder (MDD) and anticorrelated with activity in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). This association was found to be predictive of responsiveness to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) treatment. Such findings suggest that DLPFC-SGC connectivity is important for understanding both the therapeutic mechanism of rTMS in patients with MDD and the underlying pathophysiology of MDD. Objective: To evaluate SGC hyperactivity in patients with MDD before and after rTMS treatment. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this diagnostic study, among participants recruited from the adult and geriatric mood and anxiety services at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, who had participated in a randomized clinical trial, baseline SGC activity of patients with MDD was compared with healthy controls. In patients with MDD, SGC activity was compared before and after active or sham high-frequency rTMS treatment. Data collection started in July 2008 and concluded in March 2012. Neurophysiological data analysis started in January 2017 and ended in May 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: Hyperactivity in the SGC before and after rTMS treatment was measured. Subgenual cingulate cortex hyperactivity activity was quantified using significant current density (SCD), and effective connectivity between the left DLPFC and SGC was computed using significant current scattering (SCS). Both measures were computed around TMS evoked potentials standard peak latencies prior to rTMS and after rTMS treatment, comparing patients with MMD treated with active and sham rTMS. Patients with MDD were assessed with the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. Results: Of 121 patients with MDD in the initial trial, 30 (15 [50.0%] women) were compared with 30 healthy controls (15 [50.0%] women) at rTMS treatment baseline. The mean (SD) age of the cohort with MDD was 39.1 (10.9) years, and the mean (SD) age of healthy controls was 37.0 (11.0) years. Following rTMS treatment, 26 patients with MDD who had active rTMS treatment (21.5%) were compared with 17 patients with MDD who had sham treatment (14.0%). At baseline, the SGC mean (SD) SCD and mean (SD) SCS at 200 milliseconds after TMS pulse were higher in participants with MDD compared with healthy controls (SCD: 1.04 × 10-6 [1.41 × 10-6] μA/mm2 vs 3.8 × 10-7 [7.8 × 10-7] μA/mm2; z = -2.95; P = .004; SCS: 0.87 [0.86] mm vs 0.54 [0.87] mm; z = -2.27; P = .02). Baseline source current density was able to classify MDD with 77% accuracy. Scores on the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression were correlated with current density at the SGC (ρ = 0.41; P = .03). After rTMS treatment, SGC mean (SD) SCD and mean (SD) SCS at 200 milliseconds after rTMS pulse were attenuated to approximately the standard TMS-evoked potential latencies in the active rTMS group compared with the sham rTMS group (SCD: 1.57 × 10-7 [3.67 × 10-7] μA/mm2 vs 7.00 × 10-7 [7.51 × 10-7] μA/mm2; z = -2.91; P = .004; SCS: 0.20 [0.44] mm vs 0.74 [0.73] mm; z = -2.78; P = .006). Additionally, the SGC SCS change was correlated with symptom improvement on the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression in the active rTMS group (ρ = 0.58; P = .047). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this study further implicate left DLPFC-SGC effective connectivity and SGC excitability in the pathophysiology of MDD and treatment with rTMS. These findings suggest that DLPFC-SGC connectivity may be a marker of rTMS treatment responsiveness. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01515215.

Indexed as

AdultDepressive Disorder, Treatment-ResistantFemaleGyrus CinguliHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMaleNeural PathwaysOutcome Assessment, Health CarePrefrontal CortexRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID31167023
PMCPMC6551850
OpenAlexW2949052505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.