Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31167005›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

The use of complementary and integrative health approaches for chronic musculoskeletal pain in younger US Veterans: An economic evaluation.

Patricia M Herman, Anita H Yuan, Matthew S Cefalu, Karen Chu, Qing Zeng, Nell Marshall, Karl A Lorenz, Stephanie L Taylor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Integrating Massage Therapy Into the Health Care of Female Veterans.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Patricia M HermanRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5579-5654
Anita H YuanCenter for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Matthew S CefaluRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, United States of America.
Karen ChuCenter for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Qing ZengCenter for Health and Aging, VA Washington DC Healthcare System, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.
Nell MarshallCenter for the Study of Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Menlo Park, California, United States of America.
Karl A LorenzCenter for the Study of Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Menlo Park, California, United States of America.
Stephanie L TaylorCenter for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.

Funding

HSRD VA I01 HX001704
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo estimate the cost-effectiveness to the US Veterans Health Administration (VA) of the use of complementary and integrative health (CIH) approaches by younger Veterans with chronic musculoskeletal disorder (MSD) pain. PERSPECTIVE: VA healthcare system.

methodsWe used a propensity score-adjusted hierarchical linear modeling (HLM), and 2010-2013 VA administrative data to estimate differences in VA healthcare costs, pain intensity (0-10 numerical rating scale), and opioid use between CIH users and nonusers. We identified CIH use in Veterans' medical records through Current Procedural Terminology, VA workload tracking, and provider-type codes.

resultsWe identified 30,634 younger Veterans with chronic MSD pain as using CIH and 195,424 with no CIH use. CIH users differed from nonusers across all baseline covariates except the Charlson comorbidity index. They also differed on annual pre-CIH-start healthcare costs ($10,729 versus $5,818), pain (4.33 versus 3.76), and opioid use (66.6% versus 54.0%). The HLM results indicated lower annual healthcare costs (-$637; 95% CI: -$1,023, -$247), lower pain (-0.34; -0.40, -0.27), and slightly higher (less than a percentage point) opioid use (0.8; 0.6, 0.9) for CIH users in the year after CIH start. Sensitivity analyses indicated similar results for three most-used CIH approaches (acupuncture, chiropractic care, and massage), but higher costs for those with eight or more CIH visits.

conclusionsOn average CIH use appears associated with lower healthcare costs and pain and slightly higher opioid use in this population of younger Veterans with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Given the VA's growing interest in the use of CIH, further, more detailed analyses of its impacts are warranted.

Indexed as

Complementary TherapiesIntegrative MedicineVeteransAdolescentAdultChronic PainCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLinear ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMusculoskeletal PainUnited StatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31167005
PMCPMC6550429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.