ArticlePloS one2019
Enablers and barriers to effective diabetes self-management: A multi-national investigation.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 174 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Pilot Randomised Controlled Feasibility Trial for the Use of a Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Device to Assist Management of Type 2 Diabetes
The Effectiveness of Foot-Ankle Exercise and Walking Exercise on Foot Neuropathy, Stress, Quality of Life, Blood Sugar Markers, Blood Pressure, Ankle-Brachial Index, and BMI Among Diabetes Mellitus Patients
A Pilot Study of Feasibility and Exploratory Study for a Definitive Randomised Controlled Trial of Foot-Ankle Versus Walking Exercises in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: Effects on Neuropathy, Stress, and Quality of Life
Who cites it
174 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 393 citations in OpenAlex.
- Promoting community engagement in type 2 diabetes management: a systematic review and meta-analysis of community-based participatory research interventions.BMC public health · 2026Pooled it
- Exploring barriers and enablers to diabetes self-care practice in Ethiopia, 2025: A qualitative systematic review.PloS one · 2026Pooled it
- Barriers and Enablers of Diabetes Self-Management Strategies Among Arabic-Speaking Immigrants Living with Type 2 Diabetes in High-Income Western countries- A Systematic Review.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2024Pooled it
- Navigating Diabetes: Enhancing Self-Management through Education among Diabetic People at the Early Stages of the Disease-A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Pooled it
- Voices of Wisdom: Geriatric Interviews on Self-Management of Type 2 Diabetes in the United States-A Systematic Review and Metasynthesis.Journal of diabetes research · 2024Pooled it
- Patient experiences of continuous glucose monitoring and sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy for diabetes: A systematic review of qualitative studies.Journal of diabetes · 2023Pooled it
- Effects of E-health-based interventions on glycemic control for patients with type 2 diabetes: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Pooled it
- Non-adherence to self-care and associated factors among diabetes adult population in Ethiopian: A systemic review with meta-analysis.PloS one · 2021Pooled it
- A Systematic Review of Collective Evidences Investigating the Effect of Diabetes Monitoring Systems and Their Application in Health Care.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2021Pooled it
- Experiences and needs of individuals living with diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis.Frontiers in neurologyPooled it
- Leveraging Social Needs Assessments to Eliminate Barriers to Diabetes Self-Management in a Vulnerable Population.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Trial
- Effect of health literacy-based teach-back training on quality of life and treatment adherence in type 2 diabetes: an experimental study.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Reducing economic burden through split-shared care model for people living with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes and polypharmacy: a multi-center randomized controlled trial.BMC health services research · 2024Trial
- Evaluation of a Web-Based Simulation Tool for Self-Management Support in Type 1 Diabetes: A Pilot Study.IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · 2023Trial
- Effects of a Diabetes Self-Management Education Program on Glucose Levels and Self-Care in Type 1 Diabetes: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Trial
- Medicaid Claims-Based Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support Utilization in Adults With Diabetes: Sociodemographic and Geographic Assessments.The science of diabetes self-management and care · 2026Article
- Beyond Metabolic Control: Psychosocial Determinants of Quality of Life in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes.Journal of clinical nursing · 2026Article
- Psychological Burden and Diabetes Self-Management Behaviour Among Northern Saudi Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Bridging the Digital Divide in Diabetes Care With an AI-Powered Health Coaching Intervention: Qualitative Formative Study.JMIR diabetes · 2026Article
- Psychometric Properties of Ecological Momentary Assessment of Psychosocial Functioning in Adults With Complications Related to Type 1 Diabetes.Canadian journal of diabetes · 2026Article
114 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe study aimed to identify the common gaps in skills and self-efficacy for diabetes self-management and explore other factors which serve as enablers of, and barriers to, achieving optimal diabetes self-management. The information gathered could provide health professionals with valuable insights to achieving better health outcomes with self-management education and support for diabetes patients.
methodsInternational online survey and telephone interviews were conducted on adults who have type 1 or type 2 diabetes. The survey inquired about their skills and self-efficacy in diabetes self-management, while the interviews assessed other enablers of, and barriers to, diabetes self-management. Surveys were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Interviews were analysed using inductive thematic analysis.
resultsSurvey participants (N = 217) had type 1 diabetes (38.2%) or type 2 diabetes (61.8%), with a mean age of 44.56 SD 11.51 and were from 4 continents (Europe, Australia, Asia, America). Identified gaps in diabetes self-management skills included the ability to: recognize and manage the impact of stress on diabetes, exercise planning to avoid hypoglycemia and interpreting blood glucose pattern levels. Self-efficacy for healthy coping with stress and adjusting medications or food intake to reach ideal blood glucose levels were minimal. Sixteen participants were interviewed. Common enablers of diabetes self-management included: (i) the will to prevent the development of diabetes complications and (ii) the use of technological devices. Issues regarding: (i) frustration due to dynamic and chronic nature of diabetes (ii) financial constraints (iii) unrealistic expectations and (iv) work and environment-related factors limited patients' effective self-management of diabetes.
conclusionsEducational reinforcement using technological devices such as mobile application has been highlighted as an enabler of diabetes self-management and it could be employed as an intervention to alleviate identified gaps in diabetes self-management. Furthermore, improved approaches that address financial burden, work and environment-related factors as well as diabetes distress are essential for enhancing diabetes self-management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.