Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31166967›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Detection of complicated ectopic pregnancies in the hospital discharge database: A validation study.

Marion Fermaut, Arnaud Fauconnier, Aurélie Brossard, Jimmy Razafimamonjy, Xavier Fritel, Annie Serfaty

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Ectopic pregnancy: a single-center experience over ten years.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marion FermautDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Intercommunal Hospital Centre of Poissy-Saint-Germain-en-Laye, Poissy, France.
Arnaud FauconnierDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Intercommunal Hospital Centre of Poissy-Saint-Germain-en-Laye, Poissy, France.
Aurélie BrossardDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Center of Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Jimmy RazafimamonjyMedical Information Department, Intercommunal Hospital Centre of Poissy-Saint-Germain-en-Laye, Poissy, France.
Xavier FritelDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Center of Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Annie SerfatyEA 7285, Research Unit "Risk and Safety in Clinical Medicine for Women and Perinatal Health", Versailles-Saint-Quentin University (UVSQ), Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3973-5210

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveComplicated ectopic pregnancies with severe bleeding (CEPSB) are life-threatening situations and should be considered maternal near-miss cases. Previous studies have found an association between severe maternal morbidity secondary to CEPSB and substandard care. Almost all women with CEPSB are hospitalized, generating administrative and medical records. The objective of this study was to propose a method to measure the validity of the hospital discharge database (HDD) to detect CEPSB among hospital stays in two gynecological units.

methodsWe included all hospital stays of women who were 18-45 years old and hospitalized for acute pelvic pain or/and metrorrhagia in the two hospitals. The HDD was compared to medical data (gold standard). Two algorithms constructed from the International Classification of Disease (ICD-10) and Common Classification of Medical Procedures (CCAM), were applied to the HDD: a "predefined algorithm" according to coding guidelines and a "pragmatic algorithm" based on coding practices. Sensitivity, specificity and positive likelihood-ratios were calculated. False negatives and positives were analyzed to describe coding practices.

resultsAmong 370 hospital stays included, 52 were classified as CEPSB cases. The "predefined algorithm" gave a sensitivity of 23.1% (95% CI: 11.6-34.5) and a specificity of 99.1% (95% CI: 98.0-100.0) to identify CEPSB. The "pragmatic algorithm" gave a sensitivity of 63.5% (95% CI: 50.4-76.5) and a specificity of 94.7% (95% CI: 92.2-97.5) to identify CEPSB. Coding errors (77.6%) were due to misuse of diagnosis codes and because complications were not coded.

conclusionHDD is not reliable enough to detect CEPSB due to incorrect coding practices. However, it could be an ideal tool to monitor quality of care if a culture in data quality assessment is developed to improve quality of medical information.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualPatient DischargeAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansLength of StayMiddle AgedPregnancyPregnancy, EctopicReproducibility of ResultsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31166967
PMCPMC6550422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.