Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31166949›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Pelleted-hay alfalfa feed increases sheep wether weight gain and rumen bacterial richness over loose-hay alfalfa feed.

Suzanne L Ishaq, Medora M Lachman, Benjamin A Wenner, Amy Baeza, Molly Butler, Emily Gates, Sarah Olivo, Julie Buono Geddes, Patrick Hatfield, Carl J Yeoman

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. First Steps into Ruminal Microbiota Robustness.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Suzanne L IshaqBiology and the Built Environment Center, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2615-8055
Medora M LachmanDepartment of Animal and Range Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, United States of America.
Benjamin A WennerDepartment of Animal Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
Amy BaezaDepartment of Animal and Range Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, United States of America.
Molly ButlerDepartment of Animal and Range Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, United States of America.
Emily GatesDepartment of Animal and Range Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, United States of America.
Sarah OlivoBiology and the Built Environment Center, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, United States of America.
Julie Buono GeddesDepartment of Animal and Range Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0967-3845
Patrick HatfieldDepartment of Animal and Range Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, United States of America.
Carl J YeomanDepartment of Animal and Range Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, United States of America.
Montana State University · USUniversity of Oregon · USThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diet composed of smaller particles can improve feed intake, digestibility, and animal growth or health, but in ruminant species can reduce rumination and buffering-the loss of which may inhibit fermentation and digestibility. However, the explicit effect of particle size on the rumen microbiota remains untested, despite their crucial role in digestion. We evaluated the effects of reduced particle size on rumen microbiota by feeding long-stem (loose) alfalfa hay compared to a ground and pelleted version of the same alfalfa in yearling sheep wethers during a two-week experimental period. In situ digestibility of the pelleted diet was greater at 48 h compared with loose hay; however, distribution of residual fecal particle sizes in sheep did not differ between the dietary treatments at any time point (day 7 or 14). Both average daily gain and feed efficiency were greater for the wethers consuming the pelleted diet. Observed bacterial richness was very low at the end of the adaptation period and increased over the course of the study, suggesting the rumen bacterial community was still in flux after two weeks of adaptation. The pelleted-hay diet group had a greater increase in bacterial richness, including common fibrolytic rumen inhabitants. The pelleted diet was positively associated with several Succiniclasticum, a Prevotella, and uncultured taxa in the Ruminococcaceae and Rickenellaceae families and Bacteroidales order. Pelleting an alfalfa hay diet for sheep does shift the rumen microbiome, though the interplay of diet particle size, retention and gastrointestinal transit time, microbial fermentative and hydrolytic activity, and host growth or health is still largely unexplored.

Indexed as

Animal FeedAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsBacteriaGastrointestinal MicrobiomeMedicago sativaParticle SizeRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRumenSheepWeight GainRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID31166949
PMCPMC6550389
OpenAlexW2953032779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.