Evidence and E-Cigarettes: Explaining English Exceptionalism.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Tobacco industry narratives of e-cigarette use in the UK: a qualitative framing analysis.Health promotion international · 2024
   Article
2. Tobacco Industry Engagement in the House of Commons Science and Technology Select Committee E-Cigarettes Inquiry.International journal of health policy and management · 2024
   Article
3. Reply to: "Nicotine or tobacco abstinence?"European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2022
   Article
4. Text mining tweets on e-cigarette risks and benefits using machine learning following a vaping related lung injury outbreak in the USA.Healthcare analytics (New York, N.Y.) · 2022
   Article
5. The "gateway" effect of e-cigarettes may be explained by a genetic liability to risk-taking.PLoS medicine · 2021
   Article
6. Fairchild and Bayer Respond.American journal of public health · 2019
   Article
7. Continuing Burden of Tobacco-Related Harm: E-Cigarette Policy in England Is Evidence Based and Not Exceptional.American journal of public health · 2019
   Article
8. Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems: Recommendations to Regulate Their Use.American journal of public health · 2019
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  McKee Responds.2019
• Commented on by
  Continuing Burden of Tobacco-Related Harm: E-Cigarette Policy in England Is Evidence Based and Not Exceptional.2019
• Comment on
  The E-Cigarette Debate: What Counts as Evidence?2019
• Erratum issued
  ERRATUM.2020

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as