ArticleThe American journal of sports medicine2019
Changes in Cross-sectional Area and Signal Intensity of Healing Anterior Cruciate Ligaments and Grafts in the First 2 Years After Surgery.
Article in The American journal of sports medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02292004 (Bridge-Enhanced ACL Repair-Safety Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Bridge-Enhanced ACL Repair-Safety Study
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Early MRI-based quantitative outcomes are associated with a positive functional performance trajectory from 6 to 24 months post-ACL surgery.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023Trial
- Longitudinal Quantitative Mapping of Meniscal Morphological and Signal Intensity Differences After ACL Surgery.The American journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment of Bridge-Enhanced ACL Restoration: An Imaging Atlas of Morphological Features and Healing Trajectories.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- Serial Changes in Graft Diameter Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Allograft.Cartilage · 2026Article
- Passive Laxity With Functional Stability Reveals Potential Bilateral Dynamic Compensatory Mechanisms in Patients Undergoing ACL Reconstruction at Long-term Follow-up.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- Quantitative mapping of meniscus morphology using advanced imaging analysis in young patients.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Histological Analysis of Bridge-Enhanced ACL Restoration (BEAR) Tissue in Ligament Retears.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- Indications, Techniques, and Outcomes of Bridge-Enhanced ACL Restoration (BEAR).Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2025Review
- Modified Bridge-Enhanced Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair.Arthroscopy techniques · 2024Article
- Comprehensive evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging sequences for signal intensity based assessment of anterior cruciate ligament healing following surgical treatment.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2024Article
- Effect of amniotic membrane/collagen scaffolds on laryngeal cartilage repair.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2024Article
- The association between anterior cruciate ligament degeneration and incident knee osteoarthritis: Data from the osteoarthritis initiative.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2024Article
- LigaNET: A multi-modal deep learning approach to predict the risk of subsequent anterior cruciate ligament injury after surgery.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023Article
- Three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging analysis shows sex-specific patterns in changes in anterior cruciate ligament cross-sectional area along its length.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2023Article
- Quantitative MRI Biomarkers to Predict Risk of Reinjury Within 2 Years After Bridge-Enhanced ACL Restoration.The American journal of sports medicine · 2023Article
- Changes in the Cross-Sectional Profile of Treated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Within 2 Years After Surgery.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2022Article
- Posterior Tibial Slope in Patients With Torn ACL Reconstruction Grafts Compared With Primary Tear or Native ACL: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2022Review
- ACL Size, but Not Signal Intensity, Is Influenced by Sex, Body Size, and Knee Anatomy.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2021Article
- Regional Differences in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Signal Intensity After Surgical Treatment.The American journal of sports medicine · 2021Article
- Effect of Time on MRI Appearance of Graft After ACL Reconstruction: A Comparison of Autologous Hamstring and Quadriceps Tendon Grafts.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe quality of a repaired anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) or reconstructed graft is typically quantified in clinical studies by evaluating knee, lower extremity, or patient performance. However, magnetic resonance imaging of the healing ACL or graft may provide a more direct measure of tissue quality (ie, signal intensity) and quantity (ie, cross-sectional area). HYPOTHESES: (1) Average cross-sectional area or signal intensity of a healing ACL after bridge-enhanced ACL repair (BEAR) or a hamstring autograft (ACL reconstruction) will change postoperatively from 3 to 24 months. (2) The average cross-sectional area and signal intensity of the healing ligament or graft will correlate with anatomic features of the knee associated with ACL injury. STUDY
designCohort study; Level of evidence, 2.
methodsPatients with a complete midsubstance ACL tear who were treated with either BEAR (n = 10) or ACL reconstruction (n = 10) underwent magnetic resonance imaging at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Images were analyzed to determine the average cross-sectional area and signal intensity of the ACL or graft at each time point. ACL orientation, stump length, and bony anatomy were also assessed.
resultsMean cross-sectional area of the grafts was 48% to 98% larger than the contralateral intact ACLs at all time points (
conclusionHamstring autografts were larger in cross-sectional area and more vertically oriented than the native ACLs at 24 months after surgery. BEAR ACLs had a cross-sectional area, signal intensity, and sagittal orientation similar to the contralateral ACLs at 24 months. The early signal intensity and cross-sectional area of the repaired ACL may be affected by specific anatomic features, including lateral tibial slope and notch width-observations that deserve further study in a larger cohort of patients. REGISTRATION: NCT02292004 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.