Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31166559›Full record

ArticleRevista Brasileira de terapia intensiva2019

Availability of resources to treat sepsis in Brazil: a random sample of Brazilian institutions.

Leandro Utino Taniguchi, Luciano Cesar Pontes de Azevedo, Fernando Augusto Bozza, Alexandre Biasi Cavalcanti, Elaine Maria Ferreira, Fernanda Sousa Angotti Carrara, Juliana Lubarino Sousa, Reinaldo Salomão, Flávia Ribeiro Machado

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista Brasileira de terapia intensiva, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Leptospirosis: one of the forgotten diseases.Intensive care medicine · 2019
    Article
  10. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Leandro Utino TaniguchiDisciplina de Emergências Clínicas, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo - São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
Luciano Cesar Pontes de AzevedoDisciplina de Emergências Clínicas, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo - São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
Fernando Augusto BozzaBrazilian Research in Intensive Care Network - São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
Alexandre Biasi CavalcantiBrazilian Research in Intensive Care Network - São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
Elaine Maria FerreiraInstituto Latino Americano da Sepse - São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
Fernanda Sousa Angotti CarraraInstituto Latino Americano da Sepse - São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
Juliana Lubarino SousaInstituto Latino Americano da Sepse - São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
Reinaldo SalomãoInstituto Latino Americano da Sepse - São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
Flávia Ribeiro MachadoBrazilian Research in Intensive Care Network - São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
Instituto Evandro Chagas · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo characterize resource availability from a nationally representative random sample of intensive care units in Brazil.

methodsA structured online survey of participating units in the Sepsis PREvalence Assessment Database (SPREAD) study, a nationwide 1-day point prevalence survey to assess the burden of sepsis in Brazil, was sent to the medical director of each unit.

resultsA representative sample of 277 of the 317 invited units responded to the resources survey. Most of the hospitals had fewer than 500 beds (94.6%) with a median of 14 beds in the intensive care unit. Providing care for public-insured patients was the main source of income in two-thirds of the surveyed units. Own microbiology laboratory was not available for 26.8% of the surveyed intensive care units, and 10.5% did not always have access to blood cultures. Broad spectrum antibiotics were not always available in 10.5% of surveyed units, and 21.3% could not always measure lactate within three hours. Those institutions with a high resource availability (158 units, 57%) were usually larger and preferentially served patients from the private health system compared to institutions without high resource availability. Otherwise, those without high resource availability did not always have broad-spectrum antibiotics (24.4%), vasopressors (4.2%) or crystalloids (7.6%).

conclusionOur study indicates that a relevant number of units cannot perform basic monitoring and therapeutic interventions in septic patients. Our results highlight major opportunities for improvement to adhere to simple but effective interventions in Brazil.

Indexed as

BrazilCost of IllnessCritical CareHospital Bed CapacityHumansIntensive Care UnitsPrevalenceSepsisSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID31166559
PMCPMC6649213
OpenAlexW2956114633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.