Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31166372›Full record

Observational studyJornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia2019

Disability and its clinical correlates in pulmonary hypertension measured through the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0: a prospective, observational study.

Abílio Reis, Mário Santos, Inês Furtado, Célia Cruz, Pedro Sa-Couto, Alexandra Queirós, Luís Almeida, Nelson Rocha

Open access · diamondAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Abílio Reis. Pulmonary Vascular Disease Unit, Medicine Department, Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Hospital de Santo António, Porto, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4976-3781
Mário Santos. Pulmonary Vascular Disease Unit, Medicine Department, Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Hospital de Santo António, Porto, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4509-0260
Inês Furtado. Internal Medicine Service, Medicine Department, Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Hospital de Santo António, Porto, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3985-0718
Célia Cruz. Internal Medicine Service, Medicine Department, Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Hospital de Santo António, Porto, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5228-2984
Pedro Sa-Couto. Center for Research and Development in Mathematics and Applications, Department of Mathematics, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5673-8683
Alexandra Queirós. School of Health, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3172-7400
Luís Almeida. MedInUP, Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4861-8649
Nelson Rocha. Institute of Electronics and Telematics Engineering of Aveiro, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3801-7249
Hospital de Santo António · PTUniversity of Aveiro · PTUniversidade do Porto · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo characterise the degree of disability in pulmonary hypertension (PH) patients based on the World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0).

methodA prospective and observational study of patients with documented PH (N = 46). Patients completed the WHODAS 2.0 questionnaire during a scheduled routine clinical visit, and their demographic and clinical characteristics were retrieved from electronic medical records (EMR). In subsequent visits, selected clinical variables were registered to assess disease progression.

resultsWHODAS 2.0 scores were indicative of mild to moderate disability for the domains of mobility (22.0 ± 23.2), life activities (23.7 ± 25.5), and participation in society (17.2 ± 15.9), as well as total WHODAS 2.0 score (15.3 ± 15.2). For the domains of cognition (9.1 ± 14.1), self-care (8.3 ± 14.4), and interpersonal relationships (11.7 ± 15.7), scores were lower. Disability scores were, generally, proportional to the PH severity. The main baseline correlates of disability were World Health Organisation (WHO) functional class, fatigue, dyspnoea, 6-minute walking distance (6MWD), and N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP). Baseline WHODAS 2.0 scores showed significant associations with disease progression. However, this effect was not transversal to all domains, with only a few domains significantly associated with disease progression variables.

conclusionsThis PH population shows mild disability, with higher degree of disability in the domains of mobility and life activities. This study is the first one to assess disability in PH using WHODAS 2.0. Further studies should apply this scale to larger PH populations with suitable representations of more severe PH forms.

Indexed as

Disability EvaluationWorld Health OrganizationAdultAgedAnalysis of VarianceDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansHypertension, PulmonaryMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesQuality of LifeReference ValuesReproducibility of ResultsRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID31166372
PMCPMC6733722
OpenAlexW2947891178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.