Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31166203›Full record

ArticleComputers, informatics, nursing : CIN2019

Comparative Cost of Virtual Reality Training and Live Exercises for Training Hospital Workers for Evacuation.

Sharon L Farra, Matthew Gneuhs, Eric Hodgson, Burhan Kawosa, Elaine T Miller, Ashley Simon, Nathan Timm, Jackie Hausfeld

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Observational
  8. Self-efficacy in mass casualty incident training using mixed reality.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The Utility of Virtual Reality in Ophthalmology: A Review.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sharon L FarraAuthor Affiliations: Wright State University College of Nursing and Health, Dayton (Dr Farra); and Emergency Preparedness and Response, Cincinnati Children's Hospital and Medical Center, OH (Mr Gneuhs); Smale Interactive Visualization Center, Miami University, FL (Dr Hodgson); and Raj Soin College of Business, Wright State University (Mr Kawosa); University of Cincinnati College of Nursing (Dr Miller); Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (Ms Simon); and University of Cincinnati College of Medicine and Division of Emergency Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (Dr Timm); and Patient Services Institutes, Cincinnati Children's Hospital and Medical Center (Ms Hausfeld), OH.
Matthew Gneuhs
Eric Hodgson
Burhan Kawosa
Elaine T Miller
Ashley Simon
Nathan Timm
Jackie Hausfeld

Funding

AHRQ HHS R18 HS023149
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adoption of virtual reality technology may be delayed due to high up-front costs with unknown returns on that investment. In this article, we present a cost analysis of using virtual reality as a training tool. Virtual reality was used to train neonatal intensive care workers in hospital evacuation. A live disaster exercise with mannequins was also conducted that approximated the virtual experience. Comparative costs are presented for the planning, development, and implementation of both interventions. Initially, virtual reality is more expensive, with a cost of $229.79 per participant (total cost $18 617.54 per exercise) for the live drill versus $327.78 (total cost $106 951.14) for virtual reality. When development costs are extrapolated to repeated training over 3 years, however, the virtual exercise becomes less expensive with a cost of $115.43 per participant, while the cost of live exercises remains fixed. The larger initial investment in virtual reality can be spread across a large number of trainees and a longer time period with little additional cost, while each live drill requires additional costs that scale with the number of participants.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationVirtual RealityCosts and Cost AnalysisDisaster PlanningHumansIntensive Care, NeonatalNeonatal Nursing

Identifiers

PMID31166203
PMCPMC7231540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.