ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2019
ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with non-chest pain presentation at the Emergency Department: Insights from the Singapore Myocardial Infarction Registry.
Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Singapore First Aid Guidelines 2026.Singapore medical journal · 2026Guideline
- Delayed treatment of acute inferior and right ventricular myocardial infarction resulting in interventricular septal dissection with multiple perforations after percutaneous coronary intervention: a case description.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Associations of weight-adjusted waist index with cardiovascular chest pain risk in U.S. adults.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2025Article
- Brazilian Guideline for the Evaluation and Diagnosis of Chest Pain in the Emergency Department - 2025.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2025Article
- Do patients with diabetes with new onset acute myocardial infarction present with different symptoms than non-diabetic patients?Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Symptomology, Outcomes and Risk Factors of Acute Coronary Syndrome Presentations without Cardiac Chest Pain: A Scoping Review.European cardiology · 2024Article
- An analysis of racial inequities in emergency department triage among patients with stroke-like symptoms in the United States.BMC emergency medicine · 2023Observational
- Outcomes in Emergency Department Patients with Dyspnea versus Chest Pain: A Retrospective Consecutive Cohort Study.Emergency medicine international · 2022Article
- Clinical significance of prehospital 12-lead electrocardiography in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction presenting with syncope: from a multicenter observational registry (K-ACTIVE study).Heart and vessels · 2021Article
- Ischemic and bleeding risk by type 2 diabetes clusters in patients with acute coronary syndrome.Internal and emergency medicine · 2021Article
- The clinical effects of IABP pumps combined with tirofiban in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction and on patients' serum levels.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
- Plasma sphingolipids and risk of cardiovascular diseases: a large-scale lipidomic analysis.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) often presents acutely at the Emergency Department (ED). Although chest pain is a classical symptom, a significant proportion of patients do not present with chest pain. The impact of a non-chest pain (NCP) presentation on ED processes-of-care and outcomes is not fully understood. We utilised a national registry to characterise predictors, processes-of-care, and outcomes of NCP STEMI presentations. Retrospective data for all STEMI cases occurring between 2010 and 2012 were analysed from the Singapore Myocardial Infarction Registry. Cases of inpatient onset, inter-facility transfers, and out-of-hospital cardiac arrests were excluded. Univariable analysis of demographic, clinical, processes-of-care, and outcome variables was conducted. Multivariable logistic regression ascertained independent predictors of a NCP presentation and 28-day mortality. Of 4667 STEMI cases, 12.9% presented without chest pain. Patients with NCP presentation were older (median, years = 74 vs. 58; p < 0.001), more likely to be female (39.1% vs. 15.7%; p < 0.001), of the Chinese race (72.5% vs. 62.7%; p < 0.001), and with diabetes (48.6% vs. 36.7%; p < 0.001). These patients were more likely to present with syncope (6.0% vs. 1.9%; p < 0.001) or epigastric pain (10.6% vs. 4.9%; p < 0.001). Patients with NCP presentation were less likely to receive percutaneous coronary intervention (27.0% vs. 75.6%; p < 0.001), had longer door-to-balloon time (median, minutes = 83 vs. 63; p < 0.001), and experienced greater mortality at 28 days (31.2% vs. 4.5%; p < 0.001). On multivariable logistic regression, independent predictors of a NCP presentation included age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.07), diabetes (aOR = 1.76, 95% CI 1.40-2.19), BMI (aOR = 0.93, 95% CI 0.91-0.96), and dyslipidemia (aOR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.58-0.91). Absence of chest pain was an independent predictor for 28-day mortality (aOR = 3.46, 95% CI 2.64-4.52). Patients who presented with a NCP STEMI had a distinct clinical profile and experienced poorer outcomes. Routine triage ECG could be considered for patients with high-risk factors and non-classical symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31165979What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.