Observational studyThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2019
Mechanical dispersion as a marker of left ventricular dysfunction and prognosis in stable coronary artery disease.
Observational study in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Associations between cardiovascular risk factors, biomarkers, and left ventricular mechanical dispersion: insights from the ACE 1950 Study.European heart journal open · 2022Article
- Application of Combined Detection of Echocardiography and Serum NT-ProBNP in the Diagnosis of Diastolic Heart Failure and Its Effect on Left Ventricular Morphology and Diastolic Function.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022Article
- Is mechanical dispersion superior to global longitudinal strain in the assessment of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus?The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2021Article
- Peak strain dispersion within the left ventricle detected by two-dimensional speckle tracking in patients with uncomplicated systemic lupus erythematosus.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Assessment of global longitudinal strain (GLS) is superior to ejection fraction (EF) in the evaluation of left ventricular (LV) function in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). However, the role of mechanical dispersion (MD) in this context remains unresolved. We aimed to evaluate the potential role of MD as a marker of LV dysfunction and long-term prognosis in stable CAD. EF, GLS and MD were assessed in 160 patients with stable CAD, 1 year after successful coronary revascularization. Serum levels of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) and amino-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) were quantified as surrogate markers of LV dysfunction. The primary endpoint was defined as all-cause mortality, the secondary endpoint was defined as the composite of all-cause mortality and hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction or heart failure during follow-up. Whereas no associations between EF and the biochemical markers of LV function were found, both GLS and MD correlated positively with increasing levels of hs-cTnI (R = 0.315, P < 0.001 and R = 0.442, P < 0.001, respectively) and NT-proBNP (R = 0.195, P = 0.016 and R = 0.390, P < 0.001, respectively). Median MD was 46 ms (interquartile range [IQR] 37-53) and was successfully quantified in 96% of the patients. During a median follow-up of 8.4 (IQR 8.2-8.8) years, 14 deaths and 29 secondary events occurred. MD was significantly increased in non-survivors, and provided incremental prognostic value when added to EF and GLS. NT-proBNP was superior to the echocardiographic markers in predicting adverse outcomes. MD may be a promising marker of LV dysfunction and adverse prognosis in stable CAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.